From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@gmail.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@google.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform?
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:24:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1i3fV_qzx_q6nucqh4aNLi0a+iwvcis9BpYfMOkoew8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3jjDh6aEVf0bBFYc=8GtB38kL6sWVZGJiUe427A7m2ng@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mail Delivery Subsystem
<mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > As the mach-netx and mach-8695 platforms are being removed now,
> > I wonder whether we should do the same with w90x00: Here is what
> > I found after looking at the git history and external material for it.
> >
> > - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed
> > by the manufacturer
> >
> > - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x)
> > that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never
> > submitted for upstream inclusion.
> >
> > - Wan ZongShun is listed as maintainer, but the last patch he wrote
> > was in 2011.
> >
> > - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards
> > are cleanups that were apparently done without access to
> > test hardware.
> >
> > - The http://www.mcuos.com/ website listed in the MAINTAINERS
> > file is no longer reachable.
>
> Recipient inbox full
>
> Your message couldn't be delivered to mcuos.com@gmail.com. Their inbox is full, or it's getting too much mail right now.
Yes, that too.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 12:09 RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform? Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-30 12:24 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-07-30 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-30 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-30 13:58 ` Avi Fishman
2019-07-30 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a1i3fV_qzx_q6nucqh4aNLi0a+iwvcis9BpYfMOkoew8Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avifishman70@gmail.com \
--cc=benjaminfair@google.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcuos.com@gmail.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=tali.perry1@gmail.com \
--cc=tmaimon77@gmail.com \
--cc=venture@google.com \
--cc=yuenn@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).