linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:37:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB05dxcXPX_hZOFXHYaW98sdcykxVYnWdNdMOBHqLMBow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513074027.543926-7-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 09:41, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Currently we account nr_busy_cpus in no_hz idle functions.
> There is no reason why nr_busy_cpus should updated be in NO_HZ_COMMON
> configs only. Also scheduler can mark a CPU as non-busy as soon as an
> idle class task starts to run. Scheduler can then mark a CPU as busy
> as soon as its woken up from idle or a new task is placed on it's
> runqueue.
>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c     |  6 ++++--
>  kernel/sched/idle.c     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
>  kernel/sched/topology.c |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 0dfe01de22d6..8f86359efdbd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10410,7 +10410,10 @@ static void set_cpu_sd_state_busy(int cpu)
>                 goto unlock;
>         sd->nohz_idle = 0;
>
> -       atomic_inc(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
> +       if (sd && per_cpu(is_idle, cpu)) {
> +               atomic_add_unless(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, 1, per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu));
> +               per_cpu(is_idle, cpu) = 0;
> +       }
>  unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> @@ -10440,7 +10443,6 @@ static void set_cpu_sd_state_idle(int cpu)
>                 goto unlock;
>         sd->nohz_idle = 1;
>
> -       atomic_dec(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus);
>  unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index a9f5a8ace59e..c13105fe06b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -431,12 +431,25 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl
>
>  static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +       struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>         int cpu = rq->cpu;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>         if (static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
>                 set_core_busy(cpu);
>  #endif
> +
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> +       if (sds) {
> +               if (per_cpu(is_idle, cpu)) {
> +                       atomic_inc(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
> +                       per_cpu(is_idle, cpu) = 0;
> +               }
> +       }
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +#endif
>  }
>
>  static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool first)
> @@ -448,9 +461,21 @@ static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool fir
>  struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>         struct task_struct *next = rq->idle;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +       struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
> +       int cpu = rq->cpu;
>
> -       set_next_task_idle(rq, next, true);
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> +       if (sds) {
> +               atomic_add_unless(&sds->nr_busy_cpus, -1, 0);
> +               per_cpu(is_idle, cpu) = 1;
> +       }

One reason to update nr_busy_cpus only during tick is and not at each
and every single sleep/wakeup to limit the number of atomic_inc/dec in
case of storm of short running tasks. Because at the end , you waste
more time trying to accurately follow the current state of the CPU
than doing work

>
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +#endif
> +
> +       set_next_task_idle(rq, next, true);
>         return next;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 98c3cfbc5d26..b66c4dad5fd2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1496,6 +1496,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, smt_id);
>  #endif
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, is_idle);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 232fb261dfc2..730252937712 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, smt_id);
>  #endif
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, is_idle);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
> @@ -673,6 +674,7 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>         per_cpu(smt_id, cpu) = cpumask_first(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
>  #endif
> +       per_cpu(is_idle, cpu) = 1;
>         rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu), sds);
>
>         sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_NUMA);
> --
> 2.18.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13  7:40 [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] sched/fair: Update affine statistics when needed Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] sched/fair: Maintain the identity of idle-core Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-21 12:36   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-21 13:31     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-22 12:42       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-22 14:10         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-25  7:11           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/fair: Update idle-core more often Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/fair: Prefer idle CPU to cache affinity Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] sched/fair: Use affine_idler_llc for wakeups across LLC Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-21 12:37   ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2021-05-21 13:21     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] sched/fair: Remove ifdefs in waker_affine_idler_llc Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] sched/fair: Dont iterate if no idle CPUs Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-19  9:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Mel Gorman
2021-05-19 16:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKfTPtB05dxcXPX_hZOFXHYaW98sdcykxVYnWdNdMOBHqLMBow@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).