linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] sched/fair: Maintain the identity of idle-core
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:36:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCHb=tjZT60s_Gyp-mfO-rS57XUfn2hXEftJgtMBubA-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513074027.543926-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 09:40, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Scheduler maintains a per LLC info which tells if there is any idle core
> in that LLC. However this information doesn't provide which core is idle.
>
> So when iterating for idle-cores, if select_idle_core() finds an
> idle-core, then it doesn't try to reset this information.
>
> So if there was only one idle core in the LLC and select_idle_core()
> selected the idle-core, the LLC will maintain that it still has a
> idle-core.
>
> On the converse, if a task is pinned, and has a restricted
> cpus_allowed_list and LLC has multiple idle-cores, but select_idle_core
> cannot find a idle-core, LLC will no more maintain that it has an
> idle-core.
>
> As a first step to solve this problem, LLC will maintain the identity of
> the idle core instead of just the information that LLC has an idle core
>
> Along with maintaining, this change will solve both the problems listed
> above. However there are other problems that exist with the current
> infrastructure and those will continue to exist with this change and
> would be handled in subsequent patches.
>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v2->v3:
>  -  Rebase to tip/sched/core
>                 (Valentin)
>
>  include/linux/sched/topology.h |  2 +-
>  kernel/sched/fair.c            | 52 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  kernel/sched/sched.h           |  3 ++
>  kernel/sched/topology.c        |  7 +++++
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index 8f0f778b7c91..285165a35f21 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct sched_group;
>  struct sched_domain_shared {
>         atomic_t        ref;
>         atomic_t        nr_busy_cpus;
> -       int             has_idle_cores;
> +       int             idle_core;
>  };
>
>  struct sched_domain {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7920f2a4d257..c42b2b3cd08f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1578,11 +1578,11 @@ numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>  /* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
> -static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
> +static inline int get_idle_core(int cpu, int def);
>  static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
>  {
>         if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present) ||
> -           idle_core >= 0 || !test_idle_cores(cpu, false))
> +           idle_core >= 0 || get_idle_core(cpu, -1) < 0)
>                 return idle_core;
>
>         /*
> @@ -6039,29 +6039,31 @@ static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu)
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
>
> -static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
> +static inline void set_idle_core(int cpu, int val)
>  {
>         struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>
>         sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
>         if (sds)
> -               WRITE_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores, val);
> +               WRITE_ONCE(sds->idle_core, val);
>  }
>
> -static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
> +static inline int get_idle_core(int cpu, int def)
>  {
>         struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>
> -       sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> -       if (sds)
> -               return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
> +       if (static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present)) {

Would be good to explain why it is needed to add back the statis branch

> +               sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> +               if (sds)
> +                       return READ_ONCE(sds->idle_core);
> +       }
>
>         return def;
>  }
>
>  /*
>   * Scans the local SMT mask to see if the entire core is idle, and records this
> - * information in sd_llc_shared->has_idle_cores.
> + * information in sd_llc_shared->idle_core.
>   *
>   * Since SMT siblings share all cache levels, inspecting this limited remote
>   * state should be fairly cheap.
> @@ -6072,7 +6074,7 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
>         int cpu;
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
> -       if (test_idle_cores(core, true))
> +       if (get_idle_core(core, 0) >= 0)
>                 goto unlock;
>
>         for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> @@ -6083,7 +6085,7 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
>                         goto unlock;
>         }
>
> -       set_idle_cores(core, 1);
> +       set_idle_core(core, per_cpu(smt_id, core));
>  unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> @@ -6091,7 +6093,7 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
>  /*
>   * Scan the entire LLC domain for idle cores; this dynamically switches off if
>   * there are no idle cores left in the system; tracked through
> - * sd_llc->shared->has_idle_cores and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
> + * sd_llc->shared->idle_core and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
>   */
>  static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
>  {
> @@ -6144,11 +6146,11 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>
>  #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
>
> -static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
> +static inline void set_idle_core(int cpu, int val)
>  {
>  }
>
> -static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
> +static inline bool get_idle_core(int cpu, int def)
>  {
>         return def;
>  }
> @@ -6170,10 +6172,11 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
>   * comparing the average scan cost (tracked in sd->avg_scan_cost) against the
>   * average idle time for this rq (as found in rq->avg_idle).
>   */
> -static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool has_idle_core, int target)
> +static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int idle_core, int target)
>  {
>         struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
>         int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
> +       bool has_idle_core = (idle_core != -1);
>         int this = smp_processor_id();
>         struct sched_domain *this_sd;
>         u64 time;
> @@ -6206,8 +6209,13 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
>         for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
>                 if (has_idle_core) {
>                         i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> -                       if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> +                       if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +                               if ((per_cpu(smt_id, i)) == idle_core)
> +                                       set_idle_core(i, -1);
> +#endif

CPUA-core0 enters idle
All other CPUs of core0 are already idle
set idle_core = core0
CPUB-core1 enters idle
All other CPUs of core1 are already idle so core1 becomes idle

A task wakes up and select_idle_core returns CPUA-core0
then idle_core=-1

At next wake up, we skip select_idlecore whereas core1 is idle

Do I miss something ?




>                                 return i;
> +                       }
>
>                 } else {
>                         if (!--nr)
> @@ -6218,9 +6226,6 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       if (has_idle_core)
> -               set_idle_cores(this, false);
> -
>         if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
>                 time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
>                 update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
> @@ -6276,10 +6281,9 @@ static inline bool asym_fits_capacity(int task_util, int cpu)
>   */
>  static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  {
> -       bool has_idle_core = false;
> +       int i, recent_used_cpu, idle_core = -1;
>         struct sched_domain *sd;
>         unsigned long task_util;
> -       int i, recent_used_cpu;
>
>         /*
>          * On asymmetric system, update task utilization because we will check
> @@ -6357,16 +6361,16 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>                 return target;
>
>         if (sched_smt_active()) {
> -               has_idle_core = test_idle_cores(target, false);
> +               idle_core = get_idle_core(target, -1);
>
> -               if (!has_idle_core && cpus_share_cache(prev, target)) {
> +               if (idle_core < 0 && cpus_share_cache(prev, target)) {
>                         i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, prev);
>                         if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
>                                 return i;
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, has_idle_core, target);
> +       i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, idle_core, target);
>         if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
>                 return i;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index a189bec13729..22fbb50b036e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,9 @@ static inline struct sched_domain *lowest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_llc);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, smt_id);
> +#endif
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 55a0a243e871..232fb261dfc2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -644,6 +644,9 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd)
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_llc);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, smt_id);
> +#endif
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
> @@ -667,6 +670,9 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>         rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu), sd);
>         per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu) = size;
>         per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = id;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +       per_cpu(smt_id, cpu) = cpumask_first(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
> +#endif
>         rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu), sds);
>
>         sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_NUMA);
> @@ -1497,6 +1503,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
>                 sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
>                 atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
>                 atomic_set(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, sd_weight);
> +               sd->shared->idle_core = -1;
>         }
>
>         sd->private = sdd;
> --
> 2.18.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13  7:40 [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] sched/fair: Update affine statistics when needed Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] sched/fair: Maintain the identity of idle-core Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-21 12:36   ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2021-05-21 13:31     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-22 12:42       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-22 14:10         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-25  7:11           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] sched/fair: Update idle-core more often Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] sched/fair: Prefer idle CPU to cache affinity Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] sched/fair: Use affine_idler_llc for wakeups across LLC Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-21 12:37   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-05-21 13:21     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] sched/fair: Remove ifdefs in waker_affine_idler_llc Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-13  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] sched/fair: Dont iterate if no idle CPUs Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-19  9:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Mel Gorman
2021-05-19 16:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKfTPtCHb=tjZT60s_Gyp-mfO-rS57XUfn2hXEftJgtMBubA-g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).