From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq/irq_sim: provide irq_sim_fire_edge()
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeD-O5-7sBfrFn2rt27VHXwcOQ5cX2ybLHXU8kFyA_dLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Me=FP537vMVx-jkuff2GqO66T+i3XUBza2Xb4oWzGNcLw@mail.gmail.com>
niedz., 2 gru 2018 o 23:20 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> napisał(a):
>
> niedz., 2 gru 2018 o 22:56 Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> napisał(a):
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 07:14:45PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > We're getting too much into details of how to handle simulated
> > > interrupts and we can continue discussing it, but meanwhile I'd like
> > > to address a different thing:
> > >
> > > Thomas, Linus: after commit fa38869b0161 ("gpiolib: Don't support irq
> > > sharing for userspace") some libgpiod tests are failing because we can
> > > no longer depend on reading the value of a dummy GPIO after detecting
> > > an interrupt to know the edge of the interrupt. While these interrupts
> > > are triggered from debugfs and debugfs is not required to maintain
> > > compatibility, I thing having a working test suite for the GPIO
> > > subsystem and uAPI is worth applying these two patches and also the
> > > previous one[1].
> > >
> > > Can we have them applied for 4.20 or are there any objections?
> >
> > Just for the record: I objected the patch, Bartosz agrees to discuss
> > further and but because this is too much detail the patch should now be
> > applied anyhow to fix the test suite of an external project. This seems
> > wrong to me.
> >
>
> Just to look at it from a different perspective: we have a project
> whose tests rely on a behavior that was changed by Uwe's patch. While
> the patch is fine, we need to find a correct way of testing the GPIO
> user API. This may take a long time. In order to not break the tests
> of an external project in 4.20 I propose to patch the interrupt
> simulator (a component only used for testing) for now and to revisit
> it later without time pressure.
>
> Best regards,
> Bartosz
In fact after re-reading this conversation I'm still not sure what
your objection is exactly. You're proposing a solution that may well
be nicely engineered but it's specific to your gpio-simulator.
Meanwhile I'm trying to provide a more generalized API for more
testing modules to use.
Why exactly would you not merge this fix?
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] irq/irq_sim: provide a specialized variant of irq_sim_fire() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-11-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] irq/irq_sim: provide irq_sim_fire_edge() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-11-20 17:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-21 16:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-11-21 19:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-23 15:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-11-25 21:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-29 18:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-11-30 22:26 ` Linus Walleij
2018-12-02 12:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-12-02 17:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-02 21:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-02 22:20 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-03 10:23 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2018-12-03 10:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-03 10:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-03 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-05 12:19 ` Linus Walleij
2018-12-05 12:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-05 12:55 ` Linus Walleij
2018-12-17 10:32 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-17 12:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-17 13:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-05 13:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-14 14:07 ` Linus Walleij
2018-12-17 11:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-11-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: mockup: use irq_sim_fire_edge() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-12-03 11:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-11 14:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-12-11 15:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMRc=MeD-O5-7sBfrFn2rt27VHXwcOQ5cX2ybLHXU8kFyA_dLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).