From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_to_op()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:38:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2i3TPxpf5ktaQgb5EmB9wd84V+J5U6=_MuihtXx1-cp+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709103024.GO597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:30 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 06:11:19PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > + if (0) { \
> > + typeof(_var) pto_tmp__; \
> > + pto_tmp__ = (_val); \
> > + (void)pto_tmp__; \
> > + } \
>
> This is repeated at least once more; and it looks very similar to
> __typecheck() and typecheck() but is yet another variant afaict.
The problem with typecheck() is that it will complain about a mismatch
between unsigned long and u64 (defined as unsigned long long) even
though both are 64-bits wide on x86-64. Cleaning that mess up is
beyond the scope of this series, so I kept the existing checks.
--
Brian Gerst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 22:11 [PATCH v2 00/10] x86: Clean up percpu operations Brian Gerst
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/percpu: Introduce size abstraction macros Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 20:48 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_to_op() Brian Gerst
2020-07-09 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 4:38 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2020-07-10 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 16:56 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_from_op() Brian Gerst
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_add_op() Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 20:18 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/percpu: Remove "e" constraint from XADD Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 18:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_add_return_op() Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 19:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_xchg_op() Brian Gerst
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_cmpxchg_op() Brian Gerst
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_stable_op() Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 20:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-02 14:19 ` Brian Gerst
2020-07-09 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] x86/percpu: Remove unused PER_CPU() macro Brian Gerst
2020-06-01 20:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-01 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] x86: Clean up percpu operations Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-08 19:36 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-09 20:02 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-13 22:24 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-13 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-13 22:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-14 0:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-14 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-09 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMzpN2i3TPxpf5ktaQgb5EmB9wd84V+J5U6=_MuihtXx1-cp+A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).