From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clm@fb.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
olof@lxom.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 03:10:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPweEDxGEi-Nz1yMiLVW2FDm+iSqH_0SKOK6o4zO=KNaG2=XNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDwKzoxoVFSNbSnsHtqNhxB+AbdjD9XMXW0MEwNPGdr3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8a104f8b5867c682d994ffa7a74093c54469c11f
ahh, guys? ah... i'm going to try *really* hard to follow the advice
that's listed here ok?
http://www.pndc.com/documents/_PDF%20Text-PNDC%20WORKS.pdf it's a
little challenging to do so in email, as it's specifically designed
(page 6) for face-to-face conversations.
following point (1) on page 6, i believe that the question i should
be asking is best phrased as follows:
* what was the intent behind the change to a "code of conduct"?
following point (4) on page 7, a second question i believe should be
phrased as follows:
* whilst the "positive" list of behaviours look good on first glance,
we've witnessed what happened with freebsd when they adopted a "code
of conduct": would a (public) reasonable and rational discussion with
a view to removing the "proscribed" list of negative behaviours be
welcome? [1]
l.
[1] it's a little more complex than that, you get the general idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-18 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-17 2:15 Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2018-09-18 2:10 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
2018-09-30 11:47 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-17 8:53 […] " Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-30 12:09 ` Re: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, " lkcl
2018-09-30 14:07 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-30 16:27 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2018-09-16 19:22 Linus Torvalds
2018-09-17 0:18 ` Rene Herman
2018-09-17 0:23 ` Rene Herman
2018-09-17 6:57 ` opal hart
2018-09-17 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-17 17:09 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-17 21:09 ` Michael Woods
2018-09-18 1:30 ` Pavel Snajdr
2018-09-21 22:13 ` Michael Woods
2018-10-04 14:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-08 15:29 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2018-10-08 13:54 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2018-10-08 16:36 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPweEDxGEi-Nz1yMiLVW2FDm+iSqH_0SKOK6o4zO=KNaG2=XNw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lxom.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).