From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Cc: Mark Veltzer <mark@veltzer.org>, Peter Svensson <petersv@psv.nu>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:04:15 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209251602170.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020925145727.B14820@mark.mielke.cc>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Mark Mielke wrote:
> I missed this one. Does this mean that fork() bombs will have limited
> effect on root? :-)
Indeed. A user can easily run 100 while(1) {} loops, but to the
other users in the system it'll feel just like 1 loop...
> I definately want this, even on my home machine. I've always found it
> to be a sort of fatal flaw that per-user resource scheduling did not
> exist on the platforms of my choice.
It has existed since 2.2.14 or so ;)
I just didn't get around to forward-porting it to newer 2.4
kernels, until last weekend.
cheers,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-25 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-22 18:55 [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 Peter Waechtler
2002-09-22 21:32 ` Larry McVoy
2002-09-23 10:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 11:55 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-23 19:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-29 23:26 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2002-09-30 14:54 ` Corey Minyard
2002-09-23 15:30 ` Larry McVoy
2002-09-23 19:44 ` Olivier Galibert
2002-09-23 19:48 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 20:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-24 0:03 ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24 0:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24 0:14 ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24 5:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-24 20:34 ` David Schwartz
2002-09-24 7:12 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-24 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 22:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 19:59 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-23 20:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 21:08 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-09-23 22:44 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 23:01 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 23:11 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-24 0:21 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24 3:20 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 23:57 ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24 6:32 ` 1:1 threading vs. scheduler activations (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1) Ingo Molnar
2002-09-25 3:08 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24 18:10 ` [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-23 21:32 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 21:41 ` dean gaudet
2002-09-23 22:10 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 22:56 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-24 10:02 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-23 21:22 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 21:03 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24 12:03 ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 13:40 ` Peter Svensson
2002-09-24 14:20 ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 14:50 ` Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1) Peter Svensson
2002-09-24 15:19 ` Mark Veltzer
2002-09-24 17:29 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-25 18:57 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-25 19:04 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-09-25 19:29 ` Mark Veltzer
2002-09-25 19:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 18:49 ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 19:12 ` PATCH: per user fair scheduler 2.4.19 (cleaned up, thanks hch) (was: Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1)) Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 20:19 ` [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 David Schwartz
2002-09-24 21:10 ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-24 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 21:35 ` Roberto Peon
2002-09-24 21:35 ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-25 19:02 ` David Schwartz
2002-09-24 23:16 ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-24 23:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-25 19:05 ` David Schwartz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209251602170.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=mark@veltzer.org \
--cc=petersv@psv.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).