linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Lien <Jeff.Lien@wdc.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	"dgilbert@interlog.com" <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	David Darrington <david.darrington@wdc.com>,
	Jeff Furlong <jeff.furlong@wdc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Performance Improvement in CRC16 Calculations.
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:41:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN1PR04MB18246863506680B4ACB30866EA390@SN1PR04MB1824.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2089960838bccf80f6fb9cc586b1a663f1f9e9da.camel@perches.com>

Joe, Doug, Nicolas,
The CONFIG patch change suggested by Joe and Doug makes sense to do.   I'll do some additional testing to verify the performance on my systems.   


Jeff Lien

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com] 
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:06 AM
To: dgilbert@interlog.com; Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Jeffrey Lien <Jeff.Lien@wdc.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; herbert@gondor.apana.org.au; tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; David Darrington <david.darrington@wdc.com>; Jeff Furlong <jeff.furlong@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement in CRC16 Calculations.

On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 02:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 22:39 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > but below is a copy and paste of a table 27 from draft SBC-4 
> > revision 15 in chapter 4.22.4.4 on page 87.
> 
> The posted code returns the proper crc for each 
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_TABLE_SIZE value from
> 1 to 5 for these arrays.

Jeff, could you please test the suggested patch with your comparison framework again with each CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRCT10DIF_TABLE_SIZE from 1 to 5?

I get on a very limited test framework here:
(runtime average of 10 runs)

1: 4.32
2: 1.86
3: 1.31
4: 1.05
5: 0.99


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-13 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-10 19:12 [PATCH] Performance Improvement in CRC16 Calculations Jeff Lien
2018-08-10 19:23 ` Joe Perches
2018-08-10 20:02   ` Nicolas Pitre
2018-08-11  0:11     ` Joe Perches
2018-08-11  0:34       ` Nicolas Pitre
2018-08-11  2:39       ` Douglas Gilbert
2018-08-11  9:04         ` Joe Perches
2018-08-11 15:06           ` Joe Perches
2018-08-13 18:41             ` Jeffrey Lien [this message]
2018-08-13  3:36       ` Douglas Gilbert
2018-08-13  4:29         ` Joe Perches
2018-08-10 20:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2018-08-10 20:16 ` Eric Biggers
2018-08-16 14:02   ` Jeffrey Lien
2018-08-16 14:22     ` Douglas Gilbert
2018-08-16 15:41       ` Christophe LEROY
2018-08-16 17:38         ` Douglas Gilbert
2018-08-17  3:20           ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-16 15:47     ` Christophe LEROY
2018-08-10 20:56 ` Douglas Gilbert
2018-08-11 15:36 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-11 16:35   ` Joe Perches
2018-08-22  1:40   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-22  6:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-24 15:32       ` Jeffrey Lien
2018-08-24 15:39         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-24 16:29           ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-24 17:38             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-24 21:46               ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-24 21:54                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-24 22:12                   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-25  6:12                 ` Herbert Xu
2018-08-26  2:35                   ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-26  2:40                   ` [PATCH 1/4] crypto: Introduce notifier for new crypto algorithms Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-26  2:40                     ` [PATCH 2/4] crc-t10dif: Pick better transform if one becomes available Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-27  6:13                       ` Herbert Xu
2018-08-26  2:40                     ` [PATCH 3/4] crc-t10dif: Allow current transform to be inspected in sysfs Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-26  2:40                     ` [PATCH 4/4] block: Integrity profile init function to trigger module loads Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-26  8:22                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-26 13:30                         ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-26 13:44                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-08-26 13:48                             ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-27  6:09                     ` [PATCH 1/4] crypto: Introduce notifier for new crypto algorithms Herbert Xu
2018-08-30 14:57                       ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-30 15:00                       ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-30 15:00                         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] crc-t10dif: Pick better transform if one becomes available Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-30 15:00                         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] crc-t10dif: Allow current transform to be inspected in sysfs Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-31 17:17                         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] crypto: Introduce notifier for new crypto algorithms Jeffrey Lien
2018-09-04  5:21                         ` Herbert Xu
2018-09-04 13:30                         ` Torsten Duwe
2018-08-24 16:30         ` [PATCH] Performance Improvement in CRC16 Calculations Martin K. Petersen
2018-08-13  4:44 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-08-13 11:45 ` David Laight
2018-08-13 13:50   ` David Laight
2018-08-13 22:44 ` Tim Chen
2018-08-15 12:51   ` Jeffrey Lien
2018-08-15 18:31 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN1PR04MB18246863506680B4ACB30866EA390@SN1PR04MB1824.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jeff.lien@wdc.com \
    --cc=david.darrington@wdc.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jeff.furlong@wdc.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).