From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:48:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL4Hiq+2rMGYrQAH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <131a59af-a625-27b3-433e-ff8b7c36753e@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/5/21 1:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Andres,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out.
> >>
> >> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first
> >> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting
> >> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases.
> >
> > feedback on what?
> >
> > There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no
> > use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about?
>
> That's a complete fallacy, the very RFC is about clarifying a
> use case that I was hinted about, not mentioning those I described
> you in a reply. Obviously
Then consider this:
Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
for anything touching futex.c, until such time that you can provide a
coherent description of what and why you're doing things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-01 14:58 [RFC 0/4] futex request support Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 14:58 ` [RFC 1/4] futex: add op wake for a single key Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 14:58 ` [RFC 2/4] io_uring: frame out futex op Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 14:58 ` [RFC 3/4] io_uring: support futex wake requests Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 14:58 ` [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-01 15:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-01 16:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-01 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-03 10:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-04 9:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-04 11:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-05 2:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-07 12:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-03 19:03 ` Andres Freund
2021-06-03 21:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-03 21:21 ` Andres Freund
2021-06-05 0:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-07 11:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-07 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-06-03 18:59 ` [RFC 0/4] futex request support Andres Freund
2021-06-04 15:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YL4Hiq+2rMGYrQAH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).