From: Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/20] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRP7g5/T2kJ9BypS@hazel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729223610.29373-6-james.morse@arm.com>
Hi James,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:35:55PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> To support resctrl's MBA software controller, the architecture must provide
> a second configuration array to hold the mbps_val from user-space.
>
> This complicates the interface between the architecture code.
>
> Make the filesystem parts of resctrl create an array for the mba_sc
> values when the struct resctrl_schema is created. The software controller
> can be changed to use this, allowing the architecture code to only
> consider the values configured in hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 13 +++++
> 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index e12b55f815bf..a7e2cbce29d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
> #define MBM_OVERFLOW_INTERVAL 1000
> #define MAX_MBA_BW 100u
> #define MBA_IS_LINEAR 0x4
> -#define MBA_MAX_MBPS U32_MAX
> #define MAX_MBA_BW_AMD 0x800
> #define MBM_CNTR_WIDTH_OFFSET_AMD 20
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index cf0db0b7a5d0..185f9bb992d1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2030,6 +2030,60 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_all(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
> struct rdtgroup *prgrp,
> struct kernfs_node **mon_data_kn);
>
> +static int mba_sc_domain_allocate(struct rdt_resource *res,
> + struct rdt_domain *d)
> +{
> + u32 num_closid = closid_free_map_len;
> + int cpu = cpumask_any(&d->cpu_mask);
> + int i;
> +
> + d->mba_sc = kcalloc_node(num_closid, sizeof(*d->mba_sc),
> + GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> + if (!d->mba_sc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
If a CPU was hotplugged before resctrl is mounted then isn't it possible
for this to already be allocated? I might be misunderstanding the flows
here though...
> + for (i = 0; i < num_closid; i++)
> + d->mba_sc[i].mbps_val = MBA_MAX_MBPS;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mba_sc_allocate(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + struct rdt_domain *d;
> + int ret;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> +
> + if (!is_mba_sc(r))
> + return 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
> + ret = mba_sc_domain_allocate(r, d);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void mba_sc_domain_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r,
> + struct rdt_domain *d)
> +{
> + kfree(d->mba_sc);
> + d->mba_sc = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void mba_sc_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + struct rdt_domain *d;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list)
> + mba_sc_domain_destroy(r, d);
> +}
> +
> static int rdt_enable_ctx(struct rdt_fs_context *ctx)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -2117,17 +2171,27 @@ static int schemata_list_create(void)
>
> if (ret)
> break;
> +
> + ret = mba_sc_allocate(r);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * During rdt_kill_sb(), the mba_sc state is reset before
> + * destroy_schemata_list() is called: unconditionally try to free the
> + * array.
> + */
> static void schemata_list_destroy(void)
> {
> struct resctrl_schema *s, *tmp;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(s, tmp, &resctrl_schema_all, list) {
> list_del(&s->list);
> + mba_sc_destroy(s->res);
> kfree(s);
> }
> }
> @@ -3255,6 +3319,8 @@ void resctrl_offline_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
> __check_limbo(d, true);
> cancel_delayed_work(&d->cqm_limbo);
> }
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&rdt_enable_key) && is_mba_sc(r))
> + mba_sc_domain_destroy(r, d);
> bitmap_free(d->rmid_busy_llc);
> kfree(d->mbm_total);
> kfree(d->mbm_local);
> @@ -3287,6 +3353,9 @@ static int domain_setup_mon_state(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
> }
> }
>
> + if (is_mba_sc(r))
> + mba_sc_domain_allocate(r, d);
This looks to be missing an error check.
Thanks,
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 22:35 [PATCH v1 00/20] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 01/20] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2021-08-11 12:12 ` Jamie Iles
2021-09-01 21:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 02/20] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2021-08-11 12:15 ` Jamie Iles
2021-08-11 15:16 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 03/20] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2021-09-01 21:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:57 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 04/20] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline " James Morse
2021-08-11 16:10 ` Jamie Iles
2021-09-01 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 05/20] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2021-08-11 16:32 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2021-08-31 16:24 ` James Morse
2021-09-01 21:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:57 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/20] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2021-09-01 21:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:57 ` James Morse
2021-09-17 18:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 07/20] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2021-09-01 21:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:57 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 08/20] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2021-07-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 09/20] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2021-09-01 21:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:57 ` James Morse
2021-09-24 6:23 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-01 16:01 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 10/20] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2021-09-01 21:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 11/20] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the total bytes counter James Morse
2021-09-01 21:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-09-17 16:58 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 12/20] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2021-08-11 17:14 ` Jamie Iles
2021-08-31 16:25 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 13/20] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2021-09-24 6:34 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-01 16:01 ` James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 14/20] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 15/20] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 16/20] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 17/20] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 18/20] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 19/20] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2021-07-29 22:36 ` [PATCH v1 20/20] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRP7g5/T2kJ9BypS@hazel \
--to=jamie@nuviainc.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).