From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] rpmsg: Move the rpmsg control device from rpmsg_char to rpmsg_ctrl
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:46:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWpZMwgWqcPMvL5q@yoga> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0696b4d-c0b6-5283-2eda-e5791462cbba@foss.st.com>
On Mon 11 Oct 05:46 CDT 2021, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/21 1:35 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 12 Jul 05:37 PDT 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >
> >> Create the rpmsg_ctrl.c module and move the code related to the
> >> rpmsg_ctrldev device in this new module.
> >>
> >> Add the dependency between rpmsg_char and rpmsg_ctrl in the
> >> kconfig file.
> >>
> >
> > As I said in the cover letter, the only reason I can see for doing this
> > refactoring is in relation to the introduction of
> > RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL. So I would like this patch to go together with
> > that patch, together with a good motivation why there's merit to
> > creating yet another kernel module (and by bind/unbind can't be used).
> >
> > Perhaps I'm just missing some good usecase related to this?
>
>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig | 9 ++
> >> drivers/rpmsg/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 170 +----------------------------
> >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h | 2 +
> >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 5 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
> >>
> > [..]
> >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> > [..]
> >> -static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >> -{
> > [..]
> >> - dev = &ctrldev->dev;
> >> - device_initialize(dev);
> >> - dev->parent = &rpdev->dev;
> >> - dev->class = rpmsg_class;
> > [..]
> >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ctrl.c
> > [..]
> >> +static int rpmsg_ctrldev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> >> +{
> > [..]
> >> + dev = &ctrldev->dev;
> >> + device_initialize(dev);
> >> + dev->parent = &rpdev->dev;
> >
> > You lost the assignment of dev->class here, which breaks the udev rules
> > we use to invoke rpmsgexport to create endpoints and it causes udevadm
> > to complain that rpmsg_ctrlN doesn't have a "subsystem".
>
> We discussed this point with Mathieu, as a first step i kept the class, but that
> generated another dependency with the rpmsg_char device while information was
> available on the rpmsg bus. The char device and ctrl device should share the
> same class. As rpmsg_ctrl is created first it would have to create the class,and
> provide an API to rpmsg char
>
Perhaps if this is considered a common piece shared between multiple
rpmsg modules we can create such class in the rpmsg "core" itself?
> Please could you details what does means "rpmsg_ctrlN doesn't have a
> "subsystem"." What exactly the udev is looking for? could it base it check on
> the /dev/rpmsg_ctrl0 or /sys/bus/rpmsg/devices/...?
>
If I read the uevent messages correctly they seem to contain a SUBSYTEM=
property when the class is provided. But I'm not sure about the reasons
for that.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-16 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 12:37 [PATCH v5 0/4] Restructure the rpmsg char to decorrelate the control part Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-07-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] rpmsg: char: Remove useless include Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-10-09 0:30 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] rpmsg: char: Export eptdev create an destroy functions Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-10-08 23:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-11 10:39 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-07-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] rpmsg: Move the rpmsg control device from rpmsg_char to rpmsg_ctrl Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-10-08 23:35 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-11 10:46 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-10-16 4:46 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-10-18 9:13 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-10-19 3:08 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] rpmsg: Update rpmsg_chrdev_register_device function Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-10-08 23:21 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Restructure the rpmsg char to decorrelate the control part Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-11 10:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-10-19 3:28 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-19 12:54 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWpZMwgWqcPMvL5q@yoga \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).