* [willy-pagecache:for-next 58/85] mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'?
@ 2022-02-14 17:19 kernel test robot
2022-02-14 17:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-02-14 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle); +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel
tree: git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache for-next
head: c267b33d0001488f1d9dad12d6a87655e174d914
commit: 2cefeaf011db4a95ecb515cc2ca61d091a792ac1 [58/85] mm/rmap: Turn page_mlock() into folio_mlock()
config: h8300-alldefconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220214/202202142352.7A4VgqBz-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: h8300-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git remote add willy-pagecache git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache
git fetch --no-tags willy-pagecache for-next
git checkout 2cefeaf011db4a95ecb515cc2ca61d091a792ac1
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=h8300 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/folio-compat.c:169:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'clear_page_mlock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
169 | void clear_page_mlock(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c:174:6: error: redefinition of 'mlock_vma_page'
174 | void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from mm/folio-compat.c:11:
mm/internal.h:503:20: note: previous definition of 'mlock_vma_page' with type 'void(struct page *)'
503 | static inline void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'mlock_vma_page':
mm/folio-compat.c:176:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mlock_vma_folio'; did you mean 'mlock_vma_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
176 | mlock_vma_folio(page_folio(page));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mlock_vma_page
mm/folio-compat.c: At top level:
mm/folio-compat.c:179:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'page_mlock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
179 | void page_mlock(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'page_mlock':
>> mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
181 | folio_mlock(page_folio(page));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| folio_lock
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +181 mm/folio-compat.c
178
179 void page_mlock(struct page *page)
180 {
> 181 folio_mlock(page_folio(page));
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [willy-pagecache:for-next 58/85] mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'?
2022-02-14 17:19 [willy-pagecache:for-next 58/85] mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'? kernel test robot
@ 2022-02-14 17:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2022-02-14 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:19:26AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> commit: 2cefeaf011db4a95ecb515cc2ca61d091a792ac1 [58/85] mm/rmap: Turn page_mlock() into folio_mlock()
>
> mm/folio-compat.c:169:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'clear_page_mlock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 169 | void clear_page_mlock(struct page *page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/folio-compat.c:174:6: error: redefinition of 'mlock_vma_page'
> 174 | void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from mm/folio-compat.c:11:
> mm/internal.h:503:20: note: previous definition of 'mlock_vma_page' with type 'void(struct page *)'
> 503 | static inline void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page) { }
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'mlock_vma_page':
> mm/folio-compat.c:176:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mlock_vma_folio'; did you mean 'mlock_vma_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 176 | mlock_vma_folio(page_folio(page));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | mlock_vma_page
> mm/folio-compat.c: At top level:
> mm/folio-compat.c:179:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'page_mlock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 179 | void page_mlock(struct page *page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'page_mlock':
> >> mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 181 | folio_mlock(page_folio(page));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | folio_lock
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
All fixed in an update I pushed about two hours ago ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-14 17:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-14 17:19 [willy-pagecache:for-next 58/85] mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'? kernel test robot
2022-02-14 17:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).