linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, peterz@infradead.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature - co-authored-by
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 15:52:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9048b9c-22cb-fc47-8e87-1c091a9cc822@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204144000.21734-1-yashsri421@gmail.com>

On 4/12/20 8:10 pm, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> Currently, checkpatch.pl warns us for BAD_SIGN_OFF on the usage of
> non-standard signatures.
> 
> An evaluation on v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of 539 warnings due to
> non-standard signatures, 43 are due to the use of 'Co-authored-by'
> tag, which may seem correct, but is not standard.
> 
> The standard signature equivalent for 'Co-authored-by' is
> 'Co-developed-by'.
> 
> Provide a fix by suggesting users with this signature alternative and
> replacing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
> ---
> applies perfectly on the latest next-20201204 branch
> 
> changes in v2: replace commit specific example with brief evaluation
> 
> changes in v3: provide rationale to users for every signature tag suggestion;
> modify commit message describing arrival to conclusion in a structured way
> 
> changes in v4: modify rationale for certain suggestions
> 
> changes in v5: remove the tag deletion suggestions, ie "Generated-by" and "Celebrated-by"; rebase on last accepted changes; modify commit message
> 
> changes in v6: reduce tag suggestions to only "Co-authored-by"; modify commit message accordingly; include complete version changelog
> 
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 4a026926139f..fc036d545d2d 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2832,6 +2832,9 @@ sub process {
>  
>  			if ($sign_off !~ /$signature_tags/) {
>  				my $suggested_signature = find_standard_signature($sign_off);
> +				if ($sign_off =~ /co-authored-by:/i) {
> +					$suggested_signature = "Co-developed-by:";
> +				}
>  				if ($suggested_signature eq "") {
>  					WARN("BAD_SIGN_OFF",
>  					     "Non-standard signature: $sign_off\n" . $herecurr);
> 

Hi Daniel and Peter
Sorry to disturb you. Actually we were planning to introduce a fix for
suggesting users to use "Co-developed-by" tag over "Co-authored-by"
and I noticed that you have earlier used "Co-authored-by" tag.

We feel that users perhaps use this tag as they are unaware of its
standard equivalent tag, "Co-developed-by"

Do you think that this fix will be beneficial for future users? If so,
can you please add your Acked-by to the patch?

Thanks
Aditya

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-05 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-01 11:29 [PATCH v5] checkpatch: add fix and improve warning msg for Non-standard signature Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-01 17:24 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-01 18:21   ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-01 18:39     ` Joe Perches
2020-12-02  9:08       ` [PATCH] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature - co-authored-by Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-02 17:16         ` Joe Perches
2020-12-02 18:30           ` [PATCH -mmots] " Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-02 18:56             ` Joe Perches
2020-12-03  9:59               ` Aditya
2020-12-03 10:59                 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-03 12:23                   ` Aditya
2020-12-03 18:57                   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Greg KH
2020-12-03 19:00                     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-12-03 19:25                       ` Greg KH
2020-12-03 19:31                         ` Joe Perches
2020-12-04 14:40                 ` [PATCH v6] " Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-04 15:59                   ` Joe Perches
2020-12-05 10:22                   ` Aditya [this message]
2020-12-05 12:03                     ` Joe Perches
2020-12-05 12:55                       ` Aditya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9048b9c-22cb-fc47-8e87-1c091a9cc822@gmail.com \
    --to=yashsri421@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).