linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: Add tango PCIe host bridge support
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 15:08:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c80ce48f-5a7d-48d2-fd60-0d87eb0fcc0a@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170704070958.oolhapyx7uy2fly4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 04/07/2017 09:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> 
>> And at the end of smp8759_config_read:
>>
>> 	printk("in_atomic_preempt_off = %d\n", in_atomic_preempt_off());
> 
> That's confused...

That much is certain. I am indeed grasping at straws.

I grepped "scheduling while atomic", found __schedule_bug()
in kernel/sched/core.c and saw

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) && in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
		pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
		print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
		pr_cont("\n");
	}

I thought printing the value of in_atomic_preempt_off()
in the callback would indicate whether preemption had
already been turned off at that point.

It doesn't work like that?

BTW, why didn't print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip); say
where preemption had been disabled?


>> [    1.026568] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/1/0x00000002
>> [    1.032625] 5 locks held by swapper/0/1:
>> [    1.036575]  #0:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c038c684>] __driver_attach+0x50/0xd0
>> [    1.044319]  #1:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c038c694>] __driver_attach+0x60/0xd0
>> [    1.052050]  #2:  (pci_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c03309d8>] pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x44/0x94
> 
> This is a raw_spinlock_t, that disables preemption

drivers/pci/access.c

/*
 * This interrupt-safe spinlock protects all accesses to PCI
 * configuration space.
 */
DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pci_lock);


	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);


IIUC, it's not possible to call stop_machine() while holding
a raw spinlock? What about regular spinlocks? IIUC, in RT,
regular spinlocks may sleep?

I didn't find "preempt" or "schedul" in the spinlock doc.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/locking/spinlocks.txt


> Using stop_machine() is per definition doing it wrong ;-)

Here's the high-level view. My HW is borked and muxes
config space and mem space. So I need a way to freeze
the entire system, make the config space access, and
then return the system to normal. (AFAICT, config space
accesses are rare, so if I kill performance for these
accesses, the system might remain usable.)

Is there a way to do this? Mark suggested stop_machine
but it seems using it in my situation is not quite
straight-forward.

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-04 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-20  8:12 [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Marc Gonzalez
2017-06-20  8:14 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] PCI: Add DT binding for tango PCIe controller Marc Gonzalez
2017-06-20  8:17 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: Add tango PCIe host bridge support Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-02 23:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-03  9:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-03 13:27       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-04  6:58         ` Jisheng Zhang
2017-07-04  7:16           ` Jisheng Zhang
2017-07-04  8:02           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-04  8:19             ` Jisheng Zhang
2017-07-04  9:38               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-05 13:53                 ` Joao Pinto
2017-07-03  9:54     ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-03 13:13       ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-03 15:30         ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-04  7:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-04 13:08             ` Mason [this message]
2017-07-04 14:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-04 15:18                 ` Mason
2017-07-03 13:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-03 14:34         ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-04 15:58           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-04 23:42             ` Mason
2017-07-03 18:11         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-03 18:44           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-07-04 15:15           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-04 18:17             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-04 23:59           ` Mason
2017-07-05  5:21             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-05 12:33             ` Mark Brown
2017-06-20  8:18 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI: Add tango MSI controller support Marc Gonzalez
2017-07-04 20:24 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe " Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-04 22:55   ` Mason
2017-07-05 18:03     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-05 20:39       ` Mason
2017-07-05 21:34         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-05 21:59           ` Mason
2017-07-06  3:39             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-07-06 12:26               ` Mason
2017-07-06 12:40                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-06 19:46                 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c80ce48f-5a7d-48d2-fd60-0d87eb0fcc0a@free.fr \
    --to=slash.tmp@free.fr \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).