linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c
@ 2012-01-11  7:58 Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2012-01-26 20:26 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/s390: Fix " tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-01-11  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-kernel, Christian Borntraeger

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

commit 029632fbb7b7c9d85063cc9eb470de6c54873df3
    sched: Make separate sched*.c translation units

removed the include of asm/mutex.h from sched.c. This breaks the combination of

CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=yes
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX=yes
like s390 without mutex debugging:

  CC      kernel/sched/core.o
kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘mutex_spin_on_owner’:
kernel/sched/core.c:3287: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_mutex_cpu_relax’
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched/core.o] Error 1

Lets re-add the include to kernel/sched/core.c

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cecbb64..f82efdc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
+#include <asm/mutex.h>
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #include <asm/paravirt.h>
 #endif
-- 
1.7.8.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c
  2012-01-11  7:58 [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c Christian Borntraeger
@ 2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2012-01-11  9:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-18  9:33   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-26 20:26 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/s390: Fix " tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2012-01-11  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Borntraeger; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-kernel

On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> 
> commit 029632fbb7b7c9d85063cc9eb470de6c54873df3
>     sched: Make separate sched*.c translation units
> 
> removed the include of asm/mutex.h from sched.c. This breaks the combination of
> 
> CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=yes
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX=yes
> like s390 without mutex debugging:
> 
>   CC      kernel/sched/core.o
> kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘mutex_spin_on_owner’:
> kernel/sched/core.c:3287: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_mutex_cpu_relax’
> make[2]: *** [kernel/sched/core.o] Error 1
> 
> Lets re-add the include to kernel/sched/core.c

Weird, I would have expected -next to pick this up.. Anyway, no
objection although do we really need that extra #ifdef ?

> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index cecbb64..f82efdc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/tlb.h>
>  #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
> +#include <asm/mutex.h>
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  #endif


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c
  2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2012-01-11  9:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-18  9:33   ` Christian Borntraeger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-01-11  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-kernel

On 11/01/12 10:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> commit 029632fbb7b7c9d85063cc9eb470de6c54873df3
>>     sched: Make separate sched*.c translation units
>>
>> removed the include of asm/mutex.h from sched.c. This breaks the combination of
>>
>> CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=yes
>> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX=yes
>> like s390 without mutex debugging:
>>
>>   CC      kernel/sched/core.o
>> kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘mutex_spin_on_owner’:
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3287: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_mutex_cpu_relax’
>> make[2]: *** [kernel/sched/core.o] Error 1
>>
>> Lets re-add the include to kernel/sched/core.c
> 
> Weird, I would have expected -next to pick this up.. 
Maybe the builds of next runs with DEBUG_MUTEXES, which disables MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER.

> Anyway, no objection although do we really need that extra #ifdef ?

Dont think so. I consider this more as a comment why we need this. Whoever applies the patch,
feel free to remove the ifdefs.

Christian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c
  2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2012-01-11  9:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2012-01-18  9:33   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-24 10:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-01-18  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-kernel

On 11/01/12 10:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Weird, I would have expected -next to pick this up.. Anyway, no
> objection although do we really need that extra #ifdef ?

Ping.
Do you want me to resubmit without ifdefs?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c
  2012-01-18  9:33   ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2012-01-24 10:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2012-01-24 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Borntraeger; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-kernel

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/01/12 10:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Weird, I would have expected -next to pick this up.. Anyway, no
> > objection although do we really need that extra #ifdef ?
> 
> Ping.
> Do you want me to resubmit without ifdefs?

Drat, sorry for loosing this. Applied (and removed the ifdeffery
myself). Thanks!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [tip:sched/urgent] sched/s390: Fix compile error in sched/core.c
  2012-01-11  7:58 [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c Christian Borntraeger
  2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2012-01-26 20:26 ` tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-01-26 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, tglx, borntraeger, mingo

Commit-ID:  db7e527da41560f597ccdc4417cefa6b7657c0c0
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/db7e527da41560f597ccdc4417cefa6b7657c0c0
Author:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:58:16 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:38:11 +0100

sched/s390: Fix compile error in sched/core.c

Commit 029632fbb7b7c9d85063cc9eb470de6c54873df3 ("sched: Make
separate sched*.c translation units") removed the include of
asm/mutex.h from sched.c.

This breaks the combination of:

 CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=yes
 CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX=yes

like s390 without mutex debugging:

  CC      kernel/sched/core.o
  kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘mutex_spin_on_owner’:
  kernel/sched/core.c:3287: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_mutex_cpu_relax’

Lets re-add the include to kernel/sched/core.c

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1326268696-30904-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e067df1..5255c9d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+#include <asm/mutex.h>
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #include <asm/paravirt.h>
 #endif

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-26 20:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-11  7:58 [PATCH] sched/s390: fix compile error in sched/core.c Christian Borntraeger
2012-01-11  9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-11  9:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-01-18  9:33   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-01-24 10:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 20:26 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/s390: Fix " tip-bot for Christian Borntraeger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).