* [merged] zram-use-zram_slot_lock-instead-of-raw-bit_spin_lock-op.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2017-05-04 19:13 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2017-05-04 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hare, jthumshirn, minchan, mm-commits, sergey.senozhatsky
The patch titled
Subject: zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
zram-use-zram_slot_lock-instead-of-raw-bit_spin_lock-op.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op
With this clean-up phase, I want to use zram's wrapper function to lock
table access which is more consistent with other zram's functions.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492052365-16169-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-use-zram_slot_lock-instead-of-raw-bit_spin_lock-op drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-use-zram_slot_lock-instead-of-raw-bit_spin_lock-op
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -413,24 +413,38 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_stat);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
+static void zram_slot_lock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+ struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+ bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
+static void zram_slot_unlock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+ struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+ bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
static bool zram_same_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
struct page *page,
unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
{
struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
if (unlikely(!meta->table[index].handle) ||
zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME)) {
void *mem;
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
mem = kmap_atomic(page);
zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len, meta->table[index].element);
kunmap_atomic(mem);
return true;
}
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
return false;
}
@@ -446,11 +460,11 @@ static bool zram_same_page_write(struct
kunmap_atomic(mem);
/* Free memory associated with this sector now. */
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
zram_set_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME);
zram_set_element(meta, index, element);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.same_pages);
return true;
@@ -557,7 +571,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct z
if (zram_same_page_read(zram, index, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE))
return 0;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
handle = meta->table[index].handle;
size = zram_get_obj_size(meta, index);
@@ -576,7 +590,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct z
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
}
zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, handle);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -725,11 +739,11 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram
* Free memory associated with this sector
* before overwriting unused sectors.
*/
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
meta->table[index].handle = handle;
zram_set_obj_size(meta, index, comp_len);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
/* Update stats */
atomic64_add(comp_len, &zram->stats.compr_data_size);
@@ -787,7 +801,6 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
int offset, struct bio *bio)
{
size_t n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
- struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
/*
* zram manages data in physical block size units. Because logical block
@@ -808,9 +821,9 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
}
while (n >= PAGE_SIZE) {
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
index++;
n -= PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -924,9 +937,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct
zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
meta = zram->meta;
- bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
- bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+ zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from minchan@kernel.org are
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-05-04 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-04 19:13 [merged] zram-use-zram_slot_lock-instead-of-raw-bit_spin_lock-op.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).