[merged] mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm, oom: do not rely on TIF_MEMDIE for memory reserves access
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: mm, oom: do not rely on TIF_MEMDIE for memory reserves access

For ages we have been relying on TIF_MEMDIE thread flag to mark OOM
victims and then, among other things, to give these threads full access to
memory reserves.  There are few shortcomings of this implementation,
though.

First of all and the most serious one is that the full access to memory
reserves is quite dangerous because we leave no safety room for the system
to operate and potentially do last emergency steps to move on.

Secondly this flag is per task_struct while the OOM killer operates on
mm_struct granularity so all processes sharing the given mm are killed. 
Giving the full access to all these task_structs could lead to a quick
memory reserves depletion.  We have tried to reduce this risk by giving
TIF_MEMDIE only to the main thread and the currently allocating task but
that doesn't really solve this problem while it surely opens up a room for
corner cases - e.g.  GFP_NO{FS,IO} requests might loop inside the
allocator without access to memory reserves because a particular thread
was not the group leader.

Now that we have the oom reaper and that all oom victims are reapable
after 1b51e65eab64 ("oom, oom_reaper: allow to reap mm shared by the
kthreads") we can be more conservative and grant only partial access to
memory reserves because there are reasonable chances of the parallel
memory freeing.  We still want some access to reserves because we do not
want other consumers to eat up the victim's freed memory.  oom victims
will still contend with __GFP_HIGH users but those shouldn't be so
aggressive to starve oom victims completely.

Introduce ALLOC_OOM flag and give all tsk_is_oom_victim tasks access to
the half of the reserves.  This makes the access to reserves independent
on which task has passed through mark_oom_victim.  Also drop any usage of
TIF_MEMDIE from the page allocator proper and replace it by
tsk_is_oom_victim as well which will make page_alloc.c completely
TIF_MEMDIE free finally.

CONFIG_MMU=n doesn't have oom reaper so let's stick to the original
ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS approach.

There is a demand to make the oom killer memcg aware which will imply many
tasks killed at once.  This change will allow such a usecase without
worrying about complete memory reserves depletion.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170810075019.28998-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/internal.h   |   11 ++++++
 mm/oom_kill.c   |    9 +++--
 mm/page_alloc.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/internal.h~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access mm/internal.h
--- a/mm/internal.h~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -480,6 +480,17 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_l
 /* Mask to get the watermark bits */
 #define ALLOC_WMARK_MASK	(ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS-1)
 
+/*
+ * Only MMU archs have async oom victim reclaim - aka oom_reaper so we
+ * cannot assume a reduced access to memory reserves is sufficient for
+ * !MMU
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+#define ALLOC_OOM		0x08
+#else
+#define ALLOC_OOM		ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS
+#endif
+
 #define ALLOC_HARDER		0x10 /* try to alloc harder */
 #define ALLOC_HIGH		0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set */
 #define ALLOC_CPUSET		0x40 /* check for correct cpuset */
diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -824,7 +824,8 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_
 
 	/*
 	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
-	 * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
+	 * its children or threads, just give it access to memory reserves
+	 * so it can die quickly
 	 */
 	task_lock(p);
 	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
@@ -889,9 +890,9 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_
 	count_memcg_event_mm(mm, OOM_KILL);
 
 	/*
-	 * We should send SIGKILL before setting TIF_MEMDIE in order to prevent
-	 * the OOM victim from depleting the memory reserves from the user
-	 * space under its control.
+	 * We should send SIGKILL before granting access to memory reserves
+	 * in order to prevent the OOM victim from depleting the memory
+	 * reserves from the user space under its control.
 	 */
 	do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, victim, true);
 	mark_oom_victim(victim);
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-oom-do-not-rely-on-tif_memdie-for-memory-reserves-access
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z,
 {
 	long min = mark;
 	int o;
-	const bool alloc_harder = (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER);
+	const bool alloc_harder = (alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_OOM));
 
 	/* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */
 	free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1;
@@ -2964,10 +2964,21 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z,
 	 * the high-atomic reserves. This will over-estimate the size of the
 	 * atomic reserve but it avoids a search.
 	 */
-	if (likely(!alloc_harder))
+	if (likely(!alloc_harder)) {
 		free_pages -= z->nr_reserved_highatomic;
-	else
-		min -= min / 4;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * OOM victims can try even harder than normal ALLOC_HARDER
+		 * users on the grounds that it's definitely going to be in
+		 * the exit path shortly and free memory. Any allocation it
+		 * makes during the free path will be small and short-lived.
+		 */
+		if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_OOM)
+			min -= min / 2;
+		else
+			min -= min / 4;
+	}
+
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
 	/* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */
@@ -3205,7 +3216,7 @@ static void warn_alloc_show_mem(gfp_t gf
 	 * of allowed nodes.
 	 */
 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
-		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) ||
+		if (tsk_is_oom_victim(current) ||
 		    (current->flags & (PF_MEMALLOC | PF_EXITING)))
 			filter &= ~SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
 	if (in_interrupt() || !(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
@@ -3668,21 +3679,46 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	return alloc_flags;
 }
 
-bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+static bool oom_reserves_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
+	if (!tsk_is_oom_victim(tsk))
 		return false;
 
+	/*
+	 * !MMU doesn't have oom reaper so give access to memory reserves
+	 * only to the thread with TIF_MEMDIE set
+	 */
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU) && !test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Distinguish requests which really need access to full memory
+ * reserves from oom victims which can live with a portion of it
+ */
+static inline int __gfp_pfmemalloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+	if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
+		return 0;
 	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_MEMALLOC)
-		return true;
+		return ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
 	if (in_serving_softirq() && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
-		return true;
-	if (!in_interrupt() &&
-			((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
-			 unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))))
-		return true;
+		return ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
+	if (!in_interrupt()) {
+		if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
+			return ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
+		else if (oom_reserves_allowed(current))
+			return ALLOC_OOM;
+	}
 
-	return false;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+	return !!__gfp_pfmemalloc_flags(gfp_mask);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3835,6 +3871,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, u
 	unsigned long alloc_start = jiffies;
 	unsigned int stall_timeout = 10 * HZ;
 	unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+	int reserve_flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * In the slowpath, we sanity check order to avoid ever trying to
@@ -3940,15 +3977,16 @@ retry:
 	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
 		wake_all_kswapds(order, ac);
 
-	if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask))
-		alloc_flags = ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
+	reserve_flags = __gfp_pfmemalloc_flags(gfp_mask);
+	if (reserve_flags)
+		alloc_flags = reserve_flags;
 
 	/*
 	 * Reset the zonelist iterators if memory policies can be ignored.
 	 * These allocations are high priority and system rather than user
 	 * orientated.
 	 */
-	if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
+	if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || reserve_flags) {
 		ac->zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), gfp_mask);
 		ac->preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac->zonelist,
 					ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask);
@@ -4025,8 +4063,8 @@ retry:
 		goto got_pg;
 
 	/* Avoid allocations with no watermarks from looping endlessly */
-	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) &&
-	    (alloc_flags == ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS ||
+	if (tsk_is_oom_victim(current) &&
+	    (alloc_flags == ALLOC_OOM ||
 	     (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)))
 		goto nopage;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@suse.com are

mm-memory_hotplug-do-not-back-off-draining-pcp-free-pages-from-kworker-context.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-introduce-add_pages.patch
mm-sparse-fix-typo-in-online_mem_sections.patch
fs-proc-remove-priv-argument-from-is_stack.patch
treewide-remove-gfp_temporary-allocation-flag.patch