* + ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2020-11-10 21:04 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: akpm @ 2020-11-10 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gechangwei, ghe, jlbec, joseph.qi, junxiao.bi, mark, mm-commits,
piaojun, wen.gang.wang
The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: initialize ip_next_orphan
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: ocfs2: initialize ip_next_orphan
Though problem if found on a lower 4.1.12 kernel, I think upstream has
same issue.
In one node in the cluster, there is the following callback trace:
# cat /proc/21473/stack
[<ffffffffc09a2f06>] __ocfs2_cluster_lock.isra.36+0x336/0x9e0 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc09a4481>] ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested+0x121/0x520 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc09b2ce2>] ocfs2_evict_inode+0x152/0x820 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffff8122b36e>] evict+0xae/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8122bd26>] iput+0x1c6/0x230
[<ffffffffc09b60ed>] ocfs2_orphan_filldir+0x5d/0x100 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc0992ae0>] ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk+0x490/0x4f0 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc099a1e9>] ocfs2_dir_foreach+0x29/0x30 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc09b7716>] ocfs2_recover_orphans+0x1b6/0x9a0 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffffc09b9b4e>] ocfs2_complete_recovery+0x1de/0x5c0 [ocfs2]
[<ffffffff810a1399>] process_one_work+0x169/0x4a0
[<ffffffff810a1bcb>] worker_thread+0x5b/0x560
[<ffffffff810a7a2b>] kthread+0xcb/0xf0
[<ffffffff816f5d21>] ret_from_fork+0x61/0x90
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
The above stack is not reasonable, the final iput shouldn't happen in
ocfs2_orphan_filldir() function. Looking at the code,
2067 /* Skip inodes which are already added to recover list, since dio may
2068 * happen concurrently with unlink/rename */
2069 if (OCFS2_I(iter)->ip_next_orphan) {
2070 iput(iter);
2071 return 0;
2072 }
2073
The logic thinks the inode is already in recover list on seeing
ip_next_orphan is non-NULL, so it skip this inode after dropping a
reference which incremented in ocfs2_iget().
While, if the inode is already in recover list, it should have another
reference and the iput() at line 2070 should not be the final iput
(dropping the last reference). So I don't think the inode is really in
the recover list (no vmcore to confirm).
Note that ocfs2_queue_orphans(), though not shown up in the call back
trace, is holding cluster lock on the orphan directory when looking up for
unlinked inodes. The on disk inode eviction could involve a lot of IOs
which may need long time to finish. That means this node could hold the
cluster lock for very long time, that can lead to the lock requests (from
other nodes) to the orhpan directory hang for long time.
Looking at more on ip_next_orphan, I found it's not initialized when
allocating a new ocfs2_inode_info structure.
Fix: initialize ip_next_orphan as NULL.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201109171746.27884-1-wen.gang.wang@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/super.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c~ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
@@ -1713,6 +1713,7 @@ static void ocfs2_inode_init_once(void *
oi->ip_blkno = 0ULL;
oi->ip_clusters = 0;
+ oi->ip_next_orphan = NULL;
ocfs2_resv_init_once(&oi->ip_la_data_resv);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from wen.gang.wang@oracle.com are
ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-11-10 21:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-10 21:04 + ocfs2-initialize-ip_next_orphan.patch added to -mm tree akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).