+ mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch added to -mm tree

+ mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch added to -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm: memcontrol: kill mem_cgroup_nodeinfo()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: mm: memcontrol: kill mem_cgroup_nodeinfo()

No need to encapsulate a simple struct member access.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210209163304.77088-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    8 +-------
 mm/memcontrol.c            |   21 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -605,12 +605,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct lis
 
 void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage);
 
-static struct mem_cgroup_per_node *
-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
-{
-	return memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
-}
-
 /**
  * mem_cgroup_lruvec - get the lru list vector for a memcg & node
  * @memcg: memcg of the wanted lruvec
@@ -634,7 +628,7 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_
 	if (!memcg)
 		memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
 
-	mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, pgdat->node_id);
+	mz = memcg->nodeinfo[pgdat->node_id];
 	lruvec = &mz->lruvec;
 out:
 	/*
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -414,13 +414,14 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map
 					 int size, int old_size)
 {
 	struct memcg_shrinker_map *new, *old;
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	int nid;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
-		old = rcu_dereference_protected(
-			mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid)->shrinker_map, true);
+		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
+		old = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
 		/* Not yet online memcg */
 		if (!old)
 			return 0;
@@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map
 		memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_size);
 		memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
 
-		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, new);
+		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, new);
 		call_rcu(&old->rcu, memcg_free_shrinker_map_rcu);
 	}
 
@@ -450,7 +451,7 @@ static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(str
 		return;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
-		pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
+		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
 		map = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
 		kvfree(map);
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
@@ -713,7 +714,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees
 	int nid;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
-		mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
+		mz = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
 		mctz = soft_limit_tree_node(nid);
 		if (mctz)
 			mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz);
@@ -796,7 +797,7 @@ parent_nodeinfo(struct mem_cgroup_per_no
 	parent = parent_mem_cgroup(pn->memcg);
 	if (!parent)
 		return NULL;
-	return mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(parent, nid);
+	return parent->nodeinfo[nid];
 }
 
 void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
@@ -1136,7 +1137,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struc
 	if (reclaim) {
 		struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
 
-		mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(root, reclaim->pgdat->node_id);
+		mz = root->nodeinfo[reclaim->pgdat->node_id];
 		iter = &mz->iter;
 
 		if (prev && reclaim->generation != iter->generation)
@@ -1238,7 +1239,7 @@ static void __invalidate_reclaim_iterato
 	int nid;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
-		mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(from, nid);
+		mz = from->nodeinfo[nid];
 		iter = &mz->iter;
 		cmpxchg(&iter->position, dead_memcg, NULL);
 	}
@@ -2397,7 +2398,7 @@ static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsign
 				struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 				long x;
 
-				pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
+				pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
 				lstatc = per_cpu_ptr(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu, cpu);
 
 				x = lstatc->count[i];
@@ -4098,7 +4099,7 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct seq_fi
 		unsigned long file_cost = 0;
 
 		for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
-			mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, pgdat->node_id);
+			mz = memcg->nodeinfo[pgdat->node_id];
 
 			anon_cost += mz->lruvec.anon_cost;
 			file_cost += mz->lruvec.file_cost;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hannes@cmpxchg.org are

mm-page-writeback-simplify-memcg-handling-in-test_clear_page_writeback.patch
mm-memcontrol-fix-cpuhotplug-statistics-flushing.patch
mm-memcontrol-kill-mem_cgroup_nodeinfo.patch
mm-memcontrol-privatize-memcg_page_state-query-functions.patch
cgroup-rstat-support-cgroup1.patch
cgroup-rstat-punt-root-level-optimization-to-individual-controllers.patch
mm-memcontrol-switch-to-rstat.patch
mm-memcontrol-consolidate-lruvec-stat-flushing.patch
kselftests-cgroup-update-kmem-test-for-new-vmstat-implementation.patch