+ mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch added to -mm tree

+ mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch added to -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm: vmscan: use kvfree_rcu instead of call_rcu
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: mm: vmscan: use kvfree_rcu instead of call_rcu

Using kvfree_rcu() to free the old shrinker_maps instead of call_rcu(). 
We don't have to define a dedicated callback for call_rcu() anymore.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311190845.9708-6-shy828301@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |    7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -192,11 +192,6 @@ static inline int shrinker_map_size(int
 	return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
 }
 
-static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
-{
-	kvfree(container_of(head, struct memcg_shrinker_map, rcu));
-}
-
 static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				   int size, int old_size)
 {
@@ -220,7 +215,7 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struc
 		memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
 
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, new);
-		call_rcu(&old->rcu, free_shrinker_map_rcu);
+		kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shy828301@gmail.com are

mm-vmscan-use-nid-from-shrink_control-for-tracepoint.patch
mm-vmscan-consolidate-shrinker_maps-handling-code.patch
mm-vmscan-use-shrinker_rwsem-to-protect-shrinker_maps-allocation.patch
mm-vmscan-remove-memcg_shrinker_map_size.patch
mm-vmscan-use-kvfree_rcu-instead-of-call_rcu.patch
mm-memcontrol-rename-shrinker_map-to-shrinker_info.patch
mm-vmscan-add-shrinker_info_protected-helper.patch
mm-vmscan-use-a-new-flag-to-indicate-shrinker-is-registered.patch
mm-vmscan-add-per-memcg-shrinker-nr_deferred.patch
mm-vmscan-use-per-memcg-nr_deferred-of-shrinker.patch
mm-vmscan-dont-need-allocate-shrinker-nr_deferred-for-memcg-aware-shrinkers.patch
mm-memcontrol-reparent-nr_deferred-when-memcg-offline.patch
mm-vmscan-shrink-deferred-objects-proportional-to-priority.patch