* + cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2022-04-24 20:33 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-04-24 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, tj, shakeelb, roman.gushchin, mhocko, hannes, void, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: cgroup: account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Subject: cgroup: account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
The test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() testcase in the cgroup memcg tests
validates that processes in a group that perform allocations exceeding
memory.oom.group are killed. It also validates that the
memory.events.oom_kill events are properly propagated in this case.
Commit 06e11c907ea4 ("kselftests: memcg: update the oom group leaf events
test") fixed test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() to account for the fact
that the memory.events.oom_kill events in a child cgroup is propagated up
to its parent. This behavior can actually be configured by the
memory_localevents mount option, so this patch updates the testcase to
properly account for the possible presence of this mount option.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220423155619.3669555-4-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 21 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c~cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "../kselftest.h"
#include "cgroup_util.h"
+static bool has_localevents;
static bool has_recursiveprot;
/*
@@ -1180,6 +1181,7 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_eve
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
char *parent, *child;
+ long parent_oom_events;
parent = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0");
child = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0/memcg_test_1");
@@ -1217,10 +1219,16 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_eve
if (cg_read_key_long(child, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
goto cleanup;
- if (cg_read_key_long(parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
- goto cleanup;
-
- ret = KSFT_PASS;
+ parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
+ parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
+ /*
+ * If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
+ * count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
+ * have observed any events.
+ */
+ if ((has_localevents && parent_oom_events == 0) ||
+ parent_oom_events > 0)
+ ret = KSFT_PASS;
cleanup:
if (child)
@@ -1388,6 +1396,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
has_recursiveprot = proc_status;
+ proc_status = proc_mount_contains("memory_localevents");
+ if (proc_status < 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
+ has_localevents = proc_status;
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
switch (tests[i].fn(root)) {
case KSFT_PASS:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from void@manifault.com are
cgroups-refactor-children-cgroups-in-memcg-tests.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_recursiveprot-in-test_memcg_low.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
cgroup-removing-racy-check-in-test_memcg_sock.patch
cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* + cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch added to -mm tree
@ 2022-04-22 20:20 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-04-22 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, tj, shakeelb, roman.gushchin, mhocko, hannes, void, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: cgroup: account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Subject: cgroup: account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
The test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() testcase in the cgroup memcg tests
validates that processes in a group that perform allocations exceeding
memory.oom.group are killed. It also validates that the
memory.events.oom_kill events are properly propagated in this case.
Commit 06e11c907ea4 ("kselftests: memcg: update the oom group leaf events
test") fixed test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() to account for the fact
that the memory.events.oom_kill events in a child cgroup is propagated up
to its parent. This behavior can actually be configured by the
memory_localevents mount option, so this patch updates the testcase to
properly account for the possible presence of this mount option.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220422155728.3055914-4-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 17 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c~cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "../kselftest.h"
#include "cgroup_util.h"
+static bool has_localevents;
static bool has_recursiveprot;
/*
@@ -1091,6 +1092,7 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_eve
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
char *parent, *child;
+ long parent_oom_events;
parent = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0");
child = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0/memcg_test_1");
@@ -1128,7 +1130,15 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_eve
if (cg_read_key_long(child, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
goto cleanup;
- if (cg_read_key_long(parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
+ parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
+ parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
+ // If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
+ // count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
+ // have observed any events.
+ if (has_localevents) {
+ if (parent_oom_events != 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ } else if (parent_oom_events <= 0)
goto cleanup;
ret = KSFT_PASS;
@@ -1298,6 +1308,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
has_recursiveprot = proc_status;
+ proc_status = proc_mount_contains("memory_localevents");
+ if (proc_status < 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
+ has_localevents = proc_status;
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
switch (tests[i].fn(root)) {
case KSFT_PASS:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from void@manifault.com are
cgroups-refactor-children-cgroups-in-memcg-tests.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_recursiveprot-in-test_memcg_low.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
cgroup-removing-racy-check-in-test_memcg_sock.patch
cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-24 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-24 20:33 + cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-22 20:20 Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).