From: Andreas Mohr <andim2@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: andi@lisas.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bunk@kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 e100.c non-MII support status? (Re: [GIT]: Networking)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:24:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090301212412.GA13210@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9929d2390903010257p7c6fb367ga974767605033bc9@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 02:57:46AM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> I am personally sorry that nothing has been done regarding this patch.
> I still have this patch in my local tree. I admit that this patch
> has been on the low priority list, so I will make sure the patch is
> current this week and respond accordingly this week.
The whole thing has been somewhat low-priority indeed
given the probable age of some non-MII contenders. OTOH it would be quite sad
(and locally problematic) to see support for those non-MII cards vanish
come 2.6.29.
Subsequently it would then be nice to devise non-MII support
in some structured way that enables us to support them without
much burden (code-wise) on proper standards-supporting MII cards.
Thank you,
Andreas Mohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-01 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-28 8:01 [GIT]: Networking David Miller
2008-12-29 10:25 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-12-29 17:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-29 21:09 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-30 11:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-12-29 23:15 ` Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-30 12:07 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-02-28 20:37 ` 2.6.29 e100.c non-MII support status? (Re: [GIT]: Networking) Andreas Mohr
2009-03-01 10:57 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-03-01 21:24 ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2009-06-02 21:48 ` [PATCH] Add non-MII PHY support to e100 (Re: 2.6.29 e100.c non-MII support status? (Re: [GIT]: Networking)) Andreas Mohr
2009-06-03 6:01 ` e100 kills S2R on my box, plus network drops dead Andreas Mohr
2009-06-03 6:30 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-06-13 19:19 ` [PATCH] Make e100 suspend handler support PCI cards lacking PM capability Andreas Mohr
2009-06-13 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-13 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-14 12:51 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-06-14 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-14 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-14 16:46 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-06-14 17:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-14 17:20 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-06-19 8:00 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-06-14 19:46 ` [PATCH] Net / e100: Fix suspend of devices that cannot be power managed Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-18 2:03 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090301212412.GA13210@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
--to=andim2@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).