netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@gmail.com,
	jiri@mellanox.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
	saeedm@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 07/15] ipv4: Only Replay routes of interest to new listeners
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:04:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003130427.GA21529@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002174402.GB2279@nanopsycho>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:44:02PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:40:55AM CEST, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
> >From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
> >
> >When a new listener is registered to the FIB notification chain it
> >receives a dump of all the available routes in the system. Instead, make
> >sure to only replay the IPv4 routes that are actually used in the data
> >path and are of any interest to the new listener.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
> >---
> > net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> >index dc4c4e2cb0b3..4937a3503f4f 100644
> >--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> >+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> >@@ -2096,6 +2096,7 @@ static int fib_leaf_notify(struct key_vector *l, struct fib_table *tb,
> > 			   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > {
> > 	struct fib_alias *fa;
> >+	int last_slen = -1;
> > 	int err;
> > 
> > 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(fa, &l->leaf, fa_list) {
> >@@ -2110,6 +2111,15 @@ static int fib_leaf_notify(struct key_vector *l, struct fib_table *tb,
> > 		if (tb->tb_id != fa->tb_id)
> > 			continue;
> > 
> >+		if (fa->fa_slen == last_slen)
> >+			continue;
> 
> Hmm, I wonder, don't you want to continue only for FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE_TMP
> and keep the notifier call for FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD?

Yea, I think you're right. As-is this introduces a small regression
until later in the series. Will fix. Thanks!

> 
> 
> >+
> >+		last_slen = fa->fa_slen;
> >+		err = call_fib_entry_notifier(nb, FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE_TMP,
> >+					      l->key, KEYLENGTH - fa->fa_slen,
> >+					      fa, extack);
> >+		if (err)
> >+			return err;
> > 		err = call_fib_entry_notifier(nb, FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD, l->key,
> > 					      KEYLENGTH - fa->fa_slen,
> > 					      fa, extack);
> >-- 
> >2.21.0
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02  8:40 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/15] Simplify IPv4 route offload API Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/15] ipv4: Add temporary events to the FIB notification chain Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/15] ipv4: Notify route after insertion to the routing table Ido Schimmel
2019-10-03  1:34   ` David Ahern
2019-10-03  5:16     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/15] ipv4: Notify route if replacing currently offloaded one Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/15] ipv4: Notify newly added route if should be offloaded Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/15] ipv4: Handle route deletion notification Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/15] ipv4: Handle route deletion notification during flush Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/15] ipv4: Only Replay routes of interest to new listeners Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02 17:44   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03 13:04     ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Start using new IPv4 route notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02 17:52   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-02 18:01     ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03 15:10       ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/15] ipv4: Remove old route notifications and convert listeners Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/15] ipv4: Replace route in list before notifying Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/15] ipv4: Encapsulate function arguments in a struct Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/15] ipv4: Add "in hardware" indication to routes Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02 15:58   ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-10-02 18:21     ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03  2:34       ` David Ahern
2019-10-03  5:37         ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-04  1:55           ` David Ahern
2019-10-04 14:43             ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-04 16:38               ` David Ahern
2019-10-04 17:43                 ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-10-04 23:20                   ` David Ahern
2019-10-03  5:40         ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03 12:59     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-04  4:25       ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-10-02  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 13/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Mark routes as "in hardware" Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02 18:27   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03 15:16     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 14/15] netdevsim: fib: " Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02  8:41 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 15/15] selftests: netdevsim: Add test for route offload API Ido Schimmel
2019-10-02 18:17 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 00/15] Simplify IPv4 " Jiri Pirko
2019-10-03  5:18   ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191003130427.GA21529@splinter \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).