From: Yamin Friedman <yaminf@mellanox.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Tal Gilboa <talgi@mellanox.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next V2 10/10] RDMA/core: Provide RDMA DIM support for ULPs
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 05:28:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <690d58a0-df81-c02f-e46d-863ca8c3236e@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adb3687a-6db3-b1a4-cd32-8b4889550c81@grimberg.me>
On 6/26/2019 12:14 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
>> +static int ib_poll_dim_handler(struct irq_poll *iop, int budget)
>> +{
>> + struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(iop, struct ib_cq, iop);
>> + struct dim *dim = cq->dim;
>> + int completed;
>> +
>> + completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, cq->wc, IB_POLL_BATCH);
>> + if (completed < budget) {
>> + irq_poll_complete(&cq->iop);
>> + if (ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
>> + irq_poll_sched(&cq->iop);
>> + }
>> +
>> + rdma_dim(dim, completed);
>
> Why duplicate the entire thing for a one-liner?
You are right, this was leftover from a previous version where there
were more significant changes. I will remove the extra function.
>
>> +
>> + return completed;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void ib_cq_completion_softirq(struct ib_cq *cq, void *private)
>> {
>> irq_poll_sched(&cq->iop);
>> @@ -105,14 +157,18 @@ static void ib_cq_completion_softirq(struct
>> ib_cq *cq, void *private)
>> static void ib_cq_poll_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> - struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(work, struct ib_cq, work);
>> + struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(work, struct ib_cq,
>> + work);
>
> Why was that changed?
I will fix this.
>
>> int completed;
>> completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE,
>> cq->wc,
>> IB_POLL_BATCH);
>> +
>
> newline?
Same as above.
>
>> if (completed >= IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE ||
>> ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
>> queue_work(cq->comp_wq, &cq->work);
>> + else if (cq->dim)
>> + rdma_dim(cq->dim, completed);
>> }
>> static void ib_cq_completion_workqueue(struct ib_cq *cq, void
>> *private)
>> @@ -166,6 +222,8 @@ struct ib_cq *__ib_alloc_cq_user(struct ib_device
>> *dev, void *private,
>> rdma_restrack_set_task(&cq->res, caller);
>> rdma_restrack_kadd(&cq->res);
>> + rdma_dim_init(cq);
>> +
>> switch (cq->poll_ctx) {
>> case IB_POLL_DIRECT:
>> cq->comp_handler = ib_cq_completion_direct;
>> @@ -173,7 +231,13 @@ struct ib_cq *__ib_alloc_cq_user(struct
>> ib_device *dev, void *private,
>> case IB_POLL_SOFTIRQ:
>> cq->comp_handler = ib_cq_completion_softirq;
>> - irq_poll_init(&cq->iop, IB_POLL_BUDGET_IRQ, ib_poll_handler);
>> + if (cq->dim) {
>> + irq_poll_init(&cq->iop, IB_POLL_BUDGET_IRQ,
>> + ib_poll_dim_handler);
>> + } else
>> + irq_poll_init(&cq->iop, IB_POLL_BUDGET_IRQ,
>> + ib_poll_handler);
>> +
>> ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP);
>> break;
>> case IB_POLL_WORKQUEUE:
>> @@ -226,6 +290,9 @@ void ib_free_cq_user(struct ib_cq *cq, struct
>> ib_udata *udata)
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> }
>> + if (cq->dim)
>> + cancel_work_sync(&cq->dim->work);
>> + kfree(cq->dim);
>> kfree(cq->wc);
>> rdma_restrack_del(&cq->res);
>> ret = cq->device->ops.destroy_cq(cq, udata);
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
>> index abac70ad5c7c..b1b45dbe24a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
>> @@ -6305,6 +6305,8 @@ static int mlx5_ib_stage_caps_init(struct
>> mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
>> MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, disable_local_lb_mc)))
>> mutex_init(&dev->lb.mutex);
>> + dev->ib_dev.use_cq_dim = true;
>> +
>
> Please don't. This is a bad choice to opt it in by default.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 20:57 [pull request][for-next V2 0/7] Generic DIM lib for netdev and RDMA Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 01/10] linux/dim: Move logic to dim.h Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 02/10] linux/dim: Remove "net" prefix from internal DIM members Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 03/10] linux/dim: Rename externally exposed macros Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 04/10] linux/dim: Rename net_dim_sample() to net_dim_update_sample() Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 05/10] linux/dim: Rename externally used net_dim members Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-26 6:38 ` Tal Gilboa
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 06/10] linux/dim: Move implementation to .c files Saeed Mahameed
2019-07-02 16:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 07/10] linux/dim: Add completions count to dim_sample Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 08/10] linux/dim: Implement rdma_dim Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 22:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-26 11:57 ` Or Gerlitz
2019-06-27 5:25 ` Yamin Friedman
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 09/10] RDMA/nldev: Added configuration of RDMA dynamic interrupt moderation to netlink Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-27 5:29 ` Yamin Friedman
2019-06-25 20:57 ` [for-next V2 10/10] RDMA/core: Provide RDMA DIM support for ULPs Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-25 21:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-26 7:56 ` Idan Burstein
2019-07-02 5:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-02 6:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-03 18:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-04 7:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-04 12:30 ` Idan Burstein
2019-06-27 5:28 ` Yamin Friedman [this message]
2019-06-25 21:07 ` [pull request][for-next V2 0/7] Generic DIM lib for netdev and RDMA Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-27 19:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=690d58a0-df81-c02f-e46d-863ca8c3236e@mellanox.com \
--to=yaminf@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=talgi@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).