From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
su-lifan@linux.alibaba.com, "dust.li" <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:52:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+WiW+1KGVKqLZ8xQpUaZYywonZLCnkVGzRawFv=YeLzg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617357110.3822439-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:35 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
> Great!!
>
> test cmd:
> sockperf tp --tcp --ip <ip> -m 8192 -t 300
>
> server softirq cpu | server sockperf cpu | rxpck/s | rxkB/s
> page_frag_alloc 100%. 86.1% 2211785 3270145
> kmalloc 100%. 100% 2226950 3292571
> copy ETH 100% 69.3% 2140552 3163408
>
> Compared with page_frag_alloc, the performance has also increased by 19.4%. The
> reason for such a big improvement I think is that although merge is turned on in
> my test environment, there is only one buffer for each packet received.
>
> So in the page_frag_alloc scenario, when performing gro merge, one skb will
> occupy two frags, one is used to store the data in the linear space, and the
> other is a frag in the skb frags. Now, the linear space only has the header, so
> one skb only occupies one frag space.
>
> In the case of using page_frag_alloc, an skb can only contain the original 8
> packets. Now a skb merges the original 17 packets
Exactly. Never put payload in skb->head, unless you are sure that :
1) All payload can be put there. (or it is filling a full page,
followed by remaining payload in further frags for big MTU)
2) skb->head is backed by a page fraf as well (skb->head_frag == 1)
>
> It's really exciting.
>
> I fixed the retval check of pskb_may_pull and added a pskb_may_pull call.
> Here is the patch I used for testing.
>
> Thanks very much.
Excellent, I am going to submit this patch officially, since it is not
risky for stable kernels.
I will give you credits as Reporter, and co-developer.
Thanks for your help !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-02 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 16:18 [PATCH net] net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs Eric Dumazet
2021-01-13 18:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2021-01-13 19:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-01-13 22:23 ` David Laight
2021-01-14 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-01-14 9:29 ` David Laight
2021-01-14 19:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
[not found] ` <1617007696.5731978-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-03-29 9:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-31 8:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1617248264.4993114-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-01 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1617357110.3822439-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-02 12:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-04-01 13:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-01 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-01 7:14 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617267183.5697193-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-01 9:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-02 2:52 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617361253.1788838-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-02 12:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-06 2:04 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617190239.1035674-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-03-31 12:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-01 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-07 20:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-07 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-08 10:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 12:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-08 14:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-07 21:36 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-09-08 11:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 14:53 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-09-08 18:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 19:26 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANn89i+WiW+1KGVKqLZ8xQpUaZYywonZLCnkVGzRawFv=YeLzg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=su-lifan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).