From: Simon Huelck <simonmail@gmx.de>
To: Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>,
Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@st.com,
Emiliano Ingrassia <ingrassia@epigenesys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stmmac / meson8b-dwmac
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:03:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c07935ec-80b7-50f5-b96b-150ea7bcee1a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c21c30e9-e53e-02a5-c367-25898c4614e9@synopsys.com>
Hi,
i got another question about NAPI and irq assignment.
my ethernet IRQ is assigned to CPU3:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
1: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 25 Level
vgic
3: 7265279 3145278 4626601 2454147 GICv2 30 Level
arch_timer
4: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 27 Level
kvm guest vtimer
6: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 169 Level
arm-pmu
7: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 170 Level
arm-pmu
8: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 185 Level
arm-pmu
9: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 186 Level
arm-pmu
10: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 53 Edge
c1108500.i2c
11: 3 0 0 0 GICv2 105 Edge
c1108680.adc
13: 1229 0 0 0 GICv2 225 Edge
ttyAML0
14: 334 0 0 0 GICv2 228 Edge
c8100580.ir
--> 18: 498 0 104034 19348144 GICv2 40
Level eth0
19: 4500 331407 0 0 GICv2 249 Edge
d0072000.mmc
20: 13 0 0 0 GICv2 250 Edge
d0074000.mmc
31: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 35 Edge
meson
32: 0 0 0 0 GICv2 89 Edge
dw_hdmi_top_irq, c883a000.hdmi-tx
34: 140014 0 2264814045 0 GICv2 63 Level
c9100000.usb, dwc2_hsotg:usb1
IPI0: 3195735 3384376 2748050 4076544 Rescheduling
interrupts
IPI1: 1683557 683651 15136522 135 Function call
interrupts
IPI2: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop interrupts
IPI3: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop (for
crash dump) interrupts
IPI4: 0 0 0 0 Timer broadcast
interrupts
IPI5: 6 20 517 0 IRQ work interrupts
IPI6: 0 0 0 0 CPU wake-up
interrupts
Err: 0
but when checking the softirqs i see that work is distributed over all
CPUs, is this normal ?
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
HI: 0 0 0 1
TIMER: 6513467 1258789 1058072 2181809
NET_TX: 574886 708816 1820739 140379
NET_RX: 1882454 920141 15537594 34834596
BLOCK: 3369 14936 3008 2389
IRQ_POLL: 0 0 0 0
TASKLET: 512404 626201 20054827 192419
SCHED: 5946453 1067624 777568 1916812
HRTIMER: 0 0 0 0
RCU: 1934215 719530 867003 876727
regards,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a38e643c-ed9f-c306-cc95-84f70ebc1f10@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <CAFBinCDebPOsmrhSXecx48nGWHh7g_OGPbr1Y0M+n_v9Ht91ew@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-17 21:23 ` stmmac / meson8b-dwmac Simon Huelck
2019-02-04 14:34 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-06 10:36 ` Emiliano Ingrassia
2019-02-06 18:04 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-06 21:21 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-07 19:30 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-09 1:09 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-11 13:44 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-14 7:21 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-17 14:48 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-17 19:13 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 8:42 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 8:45 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 12:33 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 12:41 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 13:02 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:29 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 15:31 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:53 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:26 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:40 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:43 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:51 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 18:05 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-19 8:47 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-19 19:41 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 14:21 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 17:27 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 17:46 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 19:34 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-22 17:21 ` Anand Moon
2019-02-24 15:00 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 15:02 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 19:42 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-02-24 20:34 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-27 11:09 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-27 19:02 ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-01 9:23 ` Jose Abreu
2019-03-05 9:55 ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:35 ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:45 ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-11 14:53 ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-13 9:07 ` Jose Abreu
2019-05-22 12:48 ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-22 14:02 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-02-27 21:03 ` Simon Huelck [this message]
2019-02-18 17:05 ` Simon Huelck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c07935ec-80b7-50f5-b96b-150ea7bcee1a@gmx.de \
--to=simonmail@gmx.de \
--cc=Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=ingrassia@epigenesys.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).