netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for trusted kfunc args
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:42:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220721134245.2450-11-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721134245.2450-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Make sure verifier rejects the bad cases and ensure the good case keeps
working. The selftests make use of the bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref kfunc
added in the previous patch only for verification.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index 743ed34c1238..3fb4f69b1962 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -218,6 +218,59 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "variable ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0x7) disallowed",
 },
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 16),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 10 },
+	},
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "R1 must be referenced",
+},
+{
+	"calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 10 },
+	},
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
 {
 	"calls: basic sanity",
 	.insns = {
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 13:42 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/13] bpf: Introduce 8-byte BTF set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/13] tools/resolve_btfids: Add support for 8-byte BTF sets Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 20:51   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/13] bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructure Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/13] bpf: Add support for forcing kfunc args to be trusted Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  4:10   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-22 10:26     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-25  9:52   ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26  9:30     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 10:02       ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26 12:55         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 12:58           ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] bpf: Add documentation for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/13] net: netfilter: Deduplicate code in bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  9:02   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-07-22  9:39     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-23  7:50       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-07-25  8:52         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT timeout Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add negative " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Zvi Effron
2022-07-21 18:01   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  4:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220721134245.2450-11-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).