From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:42:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220721134245.2450-12-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721134245.2450-1-memxor@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Introduce selftests for the following kfunc helpers:
- bpf_xdp_ct_alloc
- bpf_skb_ct_alloc
- bpf_ct_insert_entry
- bpf_ct_set_timeout
- bpf_ct_change_timeout
- bpf_ct_set_status
- bpf_ct_change_status
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c | 8 ++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
index dd30b1e3a67c..cbada73a61f8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
@@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ void test_bpf_nf_ct(int mode)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_enonet_netns_id, -ENONET, "Test ENONET for bad but valid netns_id");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_enoent_lookup, -ENOENT, "Test ENOENT for failed lookup");
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_eafnosupport, -EAFNOSUPPORT, "Test EAFNOSUPPORT for invalid len__tuple");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_alloc_entry, 0, "Test for alloc new entry");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_insert_entry, 0, "Test for insert new entry");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_succ_lookup, 0, "Test for successful lookup");
+ /* allow some tolerance for test_delta_timeout value to avoid races. */
+ ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->test_delta_timeout, 8, "Test for min ct timeout update");
+ ASSERT_LE(skel->bss->test_delta_timeout, 10, "Test for max ct timeout update");
+ /* expected status is IPS_SEEN_REPLY */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_status, 2, "Test for ct status update ");
end:
test_bpf_nf__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
index f00a9731930e..196cd8dfe42a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#define EINVAL 22
#define ENOENT 2
+extern unsigned long CONFIG_HZ __kconfig;
+
int test_einval_bpf_tuple = 0;
int test_einval_reserved = 0;
int test_einval_netns_id = 0;
@@ -16,6 +18,11 @@ int test_eproto_l4proto = 0;
int test_enonet_netns_id = 0;
int test_enoent_lookup = 0;
int test_eafnosupport = 0;
+int test_alloc_entry = -EINVAL;
+int test_insert_entry = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+int test_succ_lookup = -ENOENT;
+u32 test_delta_timeout = 0;
+u32 test_status = 0;
struct nf_conn;
@@ -26,31 +33,44 @@ struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
u8 reserved[3];
} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_alloc(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32) __ksym;
struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_lookup(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32) __ksym;
+struct nf_conn *bpf_skb_ct_alloc(struct __sk_buff *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32) __ksym;
struct nf_conn *bpf_skb_ct_lookup(struct __sk_buff *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32) __ksym;
+struct nf_conn *bpf_ct_insert_entry(struct nf_conn *) __ksym;
void bpf_ct_release(struct nf_conn *) __ksym;
+void bpf_ct_set_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
+int bpf_ct_change_timeout(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
+int bpf_ct_set_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
+int bpf_ct_change_status(struct nf_conn *, u32) __ksym;
static __always_inline void
-nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*func)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
- struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32),
+nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32),
+ struct nf_conn *(*alloc_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32),
void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_ct_opts___local opts_def = { .l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP, .netns_id = -1 };
struct bpf_sock_tuple bpf_tuple;
struct nf_conn *ct;
+ int err;
__builtin_memset(&bpf_tuple, 0, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4));
- ct = func(ctx, NULL, 0, &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, NULL, 0, &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error;
opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
if (ct)
@@ -59,21 +79,24 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*func)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
opts_def.netns_id = -2;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
opts_def.netns_id = -1;
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_einval_netns_id = opts_def.error;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def) - 1);
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def) - 1);
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_einval_len_opts = opts_def.error;
opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_ICMP;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
@@ -81,37 +104,75 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*func)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
test_eproto_l4proto = opts_def.error;
opts_def.netns_id = 0xf00f;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
opts_def.netns_id = -1;
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_enonet_netns_id = opts_def.error;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_enoent_lookup = opts_def.error;
- ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4) - 1, &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4) - 1, &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
if (ct)
bpf_ct_release(ct);
else
test_eafnosupport = opts_def.error;
+
+ bpf_tuple.ipv4.saddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src IP */
+ bpf_tuple.ipv4.daddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst IP */
+ bpf_tuple.ipv4.sport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src port */
+ bpf_tuple.ipv4.dport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst port */
+
+ ct = alloc_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+ sizeof(opts_def));
+ if (ct) {
+ struct nf_conn *ct_ins;
+
+ bpf_ct_set_timeout(ct, 10000);
+ bpf_ct_set_status(ct, IPS_CONFIRMED);
+
+ ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
+ if (ct_ins) {
+ struct nf_conn *ct_lk;
+
+ ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+ &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+ if (ct_lk) {
+ /* update ct entry timeout */
+ bpf_ct_change_timeout(ct_lk, 10000);
+ test_delta_timeout = ct_lk->timeout - bpf_jiffies64();
+ test_delta_timeout /= CONFIG_HZ;
+ test_status = IPS_SEEN_REPLY;
+ bpf_ct_change_status(ct_lk, IPS_SEEN_REPLY);
+ bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+ test_succ_lookup = 0;
+ }
+ bpf_ct_release(ct_ins);
+ test_insert_entry = 0;
+ }
+ test_alloc_entry = 0;
+ }
}
SEC("xdp")
int nf_xdp_ct_test(struct xdp_md *ctx)
{
- nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, ctx);
+ nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_xdp_ct_alloc, ctx);
return 0;
}
SEC("tc")
int nf_skb_ct_test(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
{
- nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, ctx);
+ nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_skb_ct_alloc, ctx);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-21 13:42 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/13] bpf: Introduce 8-byte BTF set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/13] tools/resolve_btfids: Add support for 8-byte BTF sets Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 20:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/13] bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructure Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/13] bpf: Add support for forcing kfunc args to be trusted Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22 4:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-22 10:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-25 9:52 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26 9:30 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 10:02 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26 12:55 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 12:58 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] bpf: Add documentation for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/13] net: netfilter: Deduplicate code in bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22 9:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-07-22 9:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-23 7:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-07-25 8:52 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT timeout Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for trusted kfunc args Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add negative tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Zvi Effron
2022-07-21 18:01 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22 4:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220721134245.2450-12-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).