nvdimm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	 Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling code
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 11:27:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALTww2_OAcVZ8HpYF-g79neg9nEBqLssQ3k2G1fTX63vfZnA-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811170513.2300-7-colyli@suse.de>

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 1:07 AM Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> wrote:
>
> This patch removes old code of badblocks_set(), badblocks_clear() and
> badblocks_check(), and make them as wrappers to call _badblocks_set(),
> _badblocks_clear() and _badblocks_check().
>
> By this change now the badblock handing switch to the improved algorithm
> in  _badblocks_set(), _badblocks_clear() and _badblocks_check().
>
> This patch only contains the changes of old code deletion, new added
> code for the improved algorithms are in previous patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Cc: Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/badblocks.c | 308 +---------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 305 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
> index 3438a2517749..fc92d4e18aa3 100644
> --- a/block/badblocks.c
> +++ b/block/badblocks.c
> @@ -1405,74 +1405,7 @@ static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>  int badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>                         sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors)
>  {
> -       int hi;
> -       int lo;
> -       u64 *p = bb->page;
> -       int rv;
> -       sector_t target = s + sectors;
> -       unsigned seq;
> -
> -       if (bb->shift > 0) {
> -               /* round the start down, and the end up */
> -               s >>= bb->shift;
> -               target += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
> -               target >>= bb->shift;
> -       }
> -       /* 'target' is now the first block after the bad range */
> -
> -retry:
> -       seq = read_seqbegin(&bb->lock);
> -       lo = 0;
> -       rv = 0;
> -       hi = bb->count;
> -
> -       /* Binary search between lo and hi for 'target'
> -        * i.e. for the last range that starts before 'target'
> -        */
> -       /* INVARIANT: ranges before 'lo' and at-or-after 'hi'
> -        * are known not to be the last range before target.
> -        * VARIANT: hi-lo is the number of possible
> -        * ranges, and decreases until it reaches 1
> -        */
> -       while (hi - lo > 1) {
> -               int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
> -
> -               if (a < target)
> -                       /* This could still be the one, earlier ranges
> -                        * could not.
> -                        */
> -                       lo = mid;
> -               else
> -                       /* This and later ranges are definitely out. */
> -                       hi = mid;
> -       }
> -       /* 'lo' might be the last that started before target, but 'hi' isn't */
> -       if (hi > lo) {
> -               /* need to check all range that end after 's' to see if
> -                * any are unacknowledged.
> -                */
> -               while (lo >= 0 &&
> -                      BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > s) {
> -                       if (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < target) {
> -                               /* starts before the end, and finishes after
> -                                * the start, so they must overlap
> -                                */
> -                               if (rv != -1 && BB_ACK(p[lo]))
> -                                       rv = 1;
> -                               else
> -                                       rv = -1;
> -                               *first_bad = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
> -                               *bad_sectors = BB_LEN(p[lo]);
> -                       }
> -                       lo--;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       if (read_seqretry(&bb->lock, seq))
> -               goto retry;
> -
> -       return rv;
> +       return _badblocks_check(bb, s, sectors, first_bad, bad_sectors);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_check);
>
> @@ -1494,154 +1427,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_check);
>  int badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>                         int acknowledged)
>  {
> -       u64 *p;
> -       int lo, hi;
> -       int rv = 0;
> -       unsigned long flags;
> -
> -       if (bb->shift < 0)
> -               /* badblocks are disabled */
> -               return 1;
> -
> -       if (bb->shift) {
> -               /* round the start down, and the end up */
> -               sector_t next = s + sectors;
> -
> -               s >>= bb->shift;
> -               next += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
> -               next >>= bb->shift;
> -               sectors = next - s;
> -       }
> -
> -       write_seqlock_irqsave(&bb->lock, flags);
> -
> -       p = bb->page;
> -       lo = 0;
> -       hi = bb->count;
> -       /* Find the last range that starts at-or-before 's' */
> -       while (hi - lo > 1) {
> -               int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
> -
> -               if (a <= s)
> -                       lo = mid;
> -               else
> -                       hi = mid;
> -       }
> -       if (hi > lo && BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) > s)
> -               hi = lo;
> -
> -       if (hi > lo) {
> -               /* we found a range that might merge with the start
> -                * of our new range
> -                */
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
> -               sector_t e = a + BB_LEN(p[lo]);
> -               int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
> -
> -               if (e >= s) {
> -                       /* Yes, we can merge with a previous range */
> -                       if (s == a && s + sectors >= e)
> -                               /* new range covers old */
> -                               ack = acknowledged;
> -                       else
> -                               ack = ack && acknowledged;
> -
> -                       if (e < s + sectors)
> -                               e = s + sectors;
> -                       if (e - a <= BB_MAX_LEN) {
> -                               p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, e-a, ack);
> -                               s = e;
> -                       } else {
> -                               /* does not all fit in one range,
> -                                * make p[lo] maximal
> -                                */
> -                               if (BB_LEN(p[lo]) != BB_MAX_LEN)
> -                                       p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, BB_MAX_LEN, ack);
> -                               s = a + BB_MAX_LEN;
> -                       }
> -                       sectors = e - s;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       if (sectors && hi < bb->count) {
> -               /* 'hi' points to the first range that starts after 's'.
> -                * Maybe we can merge with the start of that range
> -                */
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[hi]);
> -               sector_t e = a + BB_LEN(p[hi]);
> -               int ack = BB_ACK(p[hi]);
> -
> -               if (a <= s + sectors) {
> -                       /* merging is possible */
> -                       if (e <= s + sectors) {
> -                               /* full overlap */
> -                               e = s + sectors;
> -                               ack = acknowledged;
> -                       } else
> -                               ack = ack && acknowledged;
> -
> -                       a = s;
> -                       if (e - a <= BB_MAX_LEN) {
> -                               p[hi] = BB_MAKE(a, e-a, ack);
> -                               s = e;
> -                       } else {
> -                               p[hi] = BB_MAKE(a, BB_MAX_LEN, ack);
> -                               s = a + BB_MAX_LEN;
> -                       }
> -                       sectors = e - s;
> -                       lo = hi;
> -                       hi++;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       if (sectors == 0 && hi < bb->count) {
> -               /* we might be able to combine lo and hi */
> -               /* Note: 's' is at the end of 'lo' */
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[hi]);
> -               int lolen = BB_LEN(p[lo]);
> -               int hilen = BB_LEN(p[hi]);
> -               int newlen = lolen + hilen - (s - a);
> -
> -               if (s >= a && newlen < BB_MAX_LEN) {
> -                       /* yes, we can combine them */
> -                       int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]) && BB_ACK(p[hi]);
> -
> -                       p[lo] = BB_MAKE(BB_OFFSET(p[lo]), newlen, ack);
> -                       memmove(p + hi, p + hi + 1,
> -                               (bb->count - hi - 1) * 8);
> -                       bb->count--;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       while (sectors) {
> -               /* didn't merge (it all).
> -                * Need to add a range just before 'hi'
> -                */
> -               if (bb->count >= MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
> -                       /* No room for more */
> -                       rv = 1;
> -                       break;
> -               } else {
> -                       int this_sectors = sectors;
> -
> -                       memmove(p + hi + 1, p + hi,
> -                               (bb->count - hi) * 8);
> -                       bb->count++;
> -
> -                       if (this_sectors > BB_MAX_LEN)
> -                               this_sectors = BB_MAX_LEN;
> -                       p[hi] = BB_MAKE(s, this_sectors, acknowledged);
> -                       sectors -= this_sectors;
> -                       s += this_sectors;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       bb->changed = 1;
> -       if (!acknowledged)
> -               bb->unacked_exist = 1;
> -       else
> -               badblocks_update_acked(bb);
> -       write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&bb->lock, flags);
> -
> -       return rv;
> +       return _badblocks_set(bb, s, sectors, acknowledged);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_set);
>
> @@ -1661,95 +1447,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_set);
>   */
>  int badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
>  {
> -       u64 *p;
> -       int lo, hi;
> -       sector_t target = s + sectors;
> -       int rv = 0;
> -
> -       if (bb->shift > 0) {
> -               /* When clearing we round the start up and the end down.
> -                * This should not matter as the shift should align with
> -                * the block size and no rounding should ever be needed.
> -                * However it is better the think a block is bad when it
> -                * isn't than to think a block is not bad when it is.
> -                */
> -               s += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
> -               s >>= bb->shift;
> -               target >>= bb->shift;
> -       }
> -
> -       write_seqlock_irq(&bb->lock);
> -
> -       p = bb->page;
> -       lo = 0;
> -       hi = bb->count;
> -       /* Find the last range that starts before 'target' */
> -       while (hi - lo > 1) {
> -               int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
> -               sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
> -
> -               if (a < target)
> -                       lo = mid;
> -               else
> -                       hi = mid;
> -       }
> -       if (hi > lo) {
> -               /* p[lo] is the last range that could overlap the
> -                * current range.  Earlier ranges could also overlap,
> -                * but only this one can overlap the end of the range.
> -                */
> -               if ((BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > target) &&
> -                   (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < target)) {
> -                       /* Partial overlap, leave the tail of this range */
> -                       int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
> -                       sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
> -                       sector_t end = a + BB_LEN(p[lo]);
> -
> -                       if (a < s) {
> -                               /* we need to split this range */
> -                               if (bb->count >= MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
> -                                       rv = -ENOSPC;
> -                                       goto out;
> -                               }
> -                               memmove(p+lo+1, p+lo, (bb->count - lo) * 8);
> -                               bb->count++;
> -                               p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, s-a, ack);
> -                               lo++;
> -                       }
> -                       p[lo] = BB_MAKE(target, end - target, ack);
> -                       /* there is no longer an overlap */
> -                       hi = lo;
> -                       lo--;
> -               }
> -               while (lo >= 0 &&
> -                      (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > s) &&
> -                      (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < target)) {
> -                       /* This range does overlap */
> -                       if (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < s) {
> -                               /* Keep the early parts of this range. */
> -                               int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
> -                               sector_t start = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
> -
> -                               p[lo] = BB_MAKE(start, s - start, ack);
> -                               /* now low doesn't overlap, so.. */
> -                               break;
> -                       }
> -                       lo--;
> -               }
> -               /* 'lo' is strictly before, 'hi' is strictly after,
> -                * anything between needs to be discarded
> -                */
> -               if (hi - lo > 1) {
> -                       memmove(p+lo+1, p+hi, (bb->count - hi) * 8);
> -                       bb->count -= (hi - lo - 1);
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       badblocks_update_acked(bb);
> -       bb->changed = 1;
> -out:
> -       write_sequnlock_irq(&bb->lock);
> -       return rv;
> +       return _badblocks_clear(bb, s, sectors);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_clear);
>
> --
> 2.35.3
>

Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-03  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 17:05 [PATCH v7 0/6] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges Coly Li
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] badblocks: add more helper structure and routines in badblocks.h Coly Li
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] badblocks: add helper routines for badblock ranges handling Coly Li
2023-09-02 14:21   ` Xiao Ni
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] badblocks: improve badblocks_set() for multiple " Coly Li
2023-09-03  1:20   ` Xiao Ni
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] badblocks: improve badblocks_clear() " Coly Li
2023-09-03  1:56   ` Xiao Ni
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] badblocks: improve badblocks_check() " Coly Li
2023-09-03  3:26   ` Xiao Ni
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling code Coly Li
2023-09-03  3:27   ` Xiao Ni [this message]
2023-08-11 17:05 ` [PATCH] test: user space code to test badblocks APIs Coly Li
2023-09-26  1:47 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges Geliang Tang
2023-09-26  6:44 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-22 19:01 ` Ira Weiny
2023-12-23  6:46   ` Li Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALTww2_OAcVZ8HpYF-g79neg9nEBqLssQ3k2G1fTX63vfZnA-Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=geliang.tang@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).