From: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
To: Joseph Reynolds <jrey@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>
Subject: Re: Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 - results
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:49:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQr9RWolIR7witlQ@heinlein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fb3f67c-84d1-a84b-c44f-a9c2774cfd9b@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote:
> On 8/4/21 3:09 PM, Patrick Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:47:31PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote:
> >
> >> 4 Surya set up a bugzilla within Intel and will administer it. Demo’d
> >> the database. We briefly examined the database fields and agreed it
> >> looks like a good start.
> >>
> > Once again I'll ask ***WHY***??!?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/YNzsE1ipYQR7yfDq@heinlein/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/YPiK8xqFPJFZDa1+@heinlein/
> >
> > Can we please create a private Github repository and be done with this topic?
>
> I don't have any insight into how to resolve this question.
>
> From today's meeting: using bugzilla has advantages over github issues:
> - lets us define the fields we need: fix commitID, CVSS score, etc.
These are pretty minor when you could just add a comment template with this
information.
> - has desirable access controls, specifically acess by the security
> respone tram plus we can add access for the problem submitter and the
> problem fixer
So does Github.
----
I really don't think that some subset of the community should go off on their
own bug tracking system. This is a waste of time to maintain and just further
segments this "Security Team" off in their own bubble.
--
Patrick Williams
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 22:57 Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 Joseph Reynolds
2021-08-04 3:04 ` Patrick Williams
2021-08-04 3:22 ` Patrick Williams
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 - ibm-acf repo Joseph Reynolds
2021-08-04 3:28 ` Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 Patrick Williams
2021-08-04 18:43 ` Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 - all distro owners please review Joseph Reynolds
2021-08-04 18:47 ` Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 4 - results Joseph Reynolds
2021-08-04 20:09 ` Patrick Williams
2021-08-04 20:39 ` Joseph Reynolds
2021-08-04 20:49 ` Patrick Williams [this message]
2021-08-04 23:23 ` Patrick Williams
2021-08-06 17:10 ` Mihm, James
2021-08-04 23:47 ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-08-04 23:57 ` Ed Tanous
2021-08-05 13:55 ` Brad Bishop
2021-08-05 13:43 ` Brad Bishop
2021-08-05 15:54 ` Brad Bishop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQr9RWolIR7witlQ@heinlein \
--to=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
--cc=bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com \
--cc=jrey@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).