From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: fam@euphon.net, kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
berto@igalia.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes()
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:39:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211183934.169161-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211183934.169161-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters
on all io paths.
Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for
fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk.
We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and
with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means
error).
So, prepare bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() now.
Callers are safe, as converting int to int64_t is safe. Concentrate on
'bytes' usage in the function (thx to Eric Blake):
compute 'int tail' via % 'int alignment' - safe
fragmentation loop 'int num' - still fragments with a cap on
max_transfer
use of 'num' within the loop
MIN(bytes, max_transfer) as well as %alignment - still works, so
calculations in if (head) {} are safe
clamp size by 'int max_write_zeroes' - safe
drv->bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(int) - safe because of clamping
clamp size by 'int max_transfer' - safe
buf allocation is still clamped to max_transfer
qemu_iovec_init_buf(size_t) - safe because of clamping
bdrv_driver_pwritev(uint64_t) - safe
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
block/io.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index b2bf18038b..c6a476559a 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
static void bdrv_parent_cb_resize(BlockDriverState *bs);
static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
- int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
+ int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
static void bdrv_parent_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *ignore,
bool ignore_bds_parents)
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_preadv_part(BdrvChild *child,
}
static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
- int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
+ int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
{
BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
QEMUIOVector qiov;
@@ -1806,6 +1806,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
bs->bl.request_alignment);
int max_transfer = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_transfer, MAX_BOUNCE_BUFFER);
+ bdrv_check_request(offset, bytes, &error_abort);
+
if (!drv) {
return -ENOMEDIUM;
}
@@ -1821,7 +1823,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
assert(max_write_zeroes >= bs->bl.request_alignment);
while (bytes > 0 && !ret) {
- int num = bytes;
+ int64_t num = bytes;
/* Align request. Block drivers can expect the "bulk" of the request
* to be aligned, and that unaligned requests do not cross cluster
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 18:39 [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] block: refactor bdrv_check_request: add errp Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-20 22:20 ` Eric Blake
2021-01-22 19:33 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] util/iov: make qemu_iovec_init_extended() honest Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 21:58 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] block: fix theoretical overflow in bdrv_init_padding() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:42 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] block/io: refactor bdrv_pad_request(): move bdrv_pad_request() up Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:50 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] block/io: bdrv_pad_request(): support qemu_iovec_init_extended failure Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:53 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] block/io: improve bdrv_check_request: check qiov too Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:48 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:50 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:02 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-01-22 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:26 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:34 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:54 ` Eric Blake
2021-01-23 14:34 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-01-22 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 17:22 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 18:29 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-09 10:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 2:56 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 6:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 14:59 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:13 ` iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 16:29 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 18:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 22:47 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-03 10:45 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-04 15:18 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201211183934.169161-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).