qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/20] cputlb: Replace switches in load/store_helper with callback
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:02:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c254159-9b63-b66e-dca7-af3d30167f49@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9e498eb-6d63-11a6-01d8-1a32f5b14236@redhat.com>

On 23/09/19 11:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.19 11:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 22/09/19 05:54, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> +/* Wrap the unaligned load helpers to that they have a common signature.  */
>>> +static inline uint64_t wrap_ldub(const void *haddr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return ldub_p(haddr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline uint64_t wrap_lduw_be(const void *haddr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return lduw_be_p(haddr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline uint64_t wrap_lduw_le(const void *haddr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return lduw_le_p(haddr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline uint64_t wrap_ldul_be(const void *haddr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return (uint32_t)ldl_be_p(haddr);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline uint64_t wrap_ldul_le(const void *haddr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return (uint32_t)ldl_le_p(haddr);
>>> +}
>>
>> Any reason to have these five functions (plus five for stores) instead
>> of a pair
>>
>> static uint64_t ld_memop(const void *haddr, MemOp op)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> static uint64_t st_memop(void *haddr, MemOp op, uint64_t val)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> that includes the switches?  Everything should be inlined just the same
>> if you do
>>
>>         if (unlikely(tlb_addr & TLB_BSWAP)) {
>>             st_memop(haddr, op ^ MO_BSWAP, val);
>>         } else {
>>             st_memop(haddr, op, val);
>>         }
> 
> I asked the same question on v2 and Richard explained that - for
> whatever reason -  the compiler will not properly propagate the constant
> in the "op ^ MO_BSWAP" case.

Even if ld_memop and st_memop are __always_inline__?

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-22  3:54 [PATCH v3 00/20] Move rom and notdirty handling to cputlb Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] exec: Use TARGET_PAGE_BITS_MIN for TLB flags Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] exec: Split out variable page size support to exec-vary.c Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 16:27     ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] exec: Use const alias for TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] exec: Restrict TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY assert to CONFIG_DEBUG_TCG Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] exec: Promote TARGET_PAGE_MASK to target_long Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] exec: Tidy TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] exec: Cache TARGET_PAGE_MASK for TARGET_PAGE_BITS_VARY Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] cputlb: Disable __always_inline__ without optimization Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  9:18   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-23  9:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-23 16:00     ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 16:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-23 18:09         ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] cputlb: Replace switches in load/store_helper with callback Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:32   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23  9:27   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-23  9:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-23  9:54     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 10:02       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-09-23 15:52         ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 18:18           ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] cputlb: Introduce TLB_BSWAP Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] exec: Adjust notdirty tracing Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  9:17   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] cputlb: Move ROM handling from I/O path to TLB path Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] cputlb: Move NOTDIRTY " Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23  9:30   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] cputlb: Partially inline memory_region_section_get_iotlb Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] cputlb: Merge and move memory_notdirty_write_{prepare, complete} Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] cputlb: Handle TLB_NOTDIRTY in probe_access Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] cputlb: Remove cpu->mem_io_vaddr Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:50   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] cputlb: Remove tb_invalidate_phys_page_range is_cpu_write_access Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 16:05     ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-23 16:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] cputlb: Pass retaddr to tb_invalidate_phys_page_fast Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] cputlb: Pass retaddr to tb_check_watchpoint Richard Henderson
2019-09-23  8:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-22  4:02 ` [PATCH v3 00/20] Move rom and notdirty handling to cputlb Richard Henderson
2019-09-22  6:46 ` no-reply
2019-09-23  8:23 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c254159-9b63-b66e-dca7-af3d30167f49@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).