From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-img convert: Fix sparseness detection
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:31:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH14BcdHL3swf9Q2@merkur.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AD190B98-4F27-4170-94BE-D0E3DB2A3EB3@kamp.de>
Am 19.04.2021 um 11:13 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
>
>
> > Am 19.04.2021 um 10:36 schrieb Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Am 15.04.2021 um 17:22 schrieb Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>:
> >>
> >> Peter, three years ago you changed 'qemu-img convert' to sacrifice some
> >> sparsification in order to get aligned requests on the target image. At
> >> the time, I thought the impact would be small, but it turns out that
> >> this can end up wasting gigabytes of storagee (like converting a fully
> >> zeroed 10 GB image taking 2.8 GB instead of a few kilobytes).
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882917
> >>
> >> I'm not entirely sure how to attack this best since this is a tradeoff,
> >> but maybe the approach in this series is still good enough for the case
> >> that you wanted to fix back then?
> >>
> >> Of course, it would be possible to have a more complete fix like looking
> >> forward a few blocks more before writing data, but that would probably
> >> not be entirely trivial because you would have to merge blocks with ZERO
> >> block status with DATA blocks that contain only zeros. I'm not sure if
> >> it's worth this complication of the code.
> >
> > I will try to look into this asap.
>
> Besides from the reproducer described in the ticket, I retried my old
> conversion test in our environment:
>
> Before commit 8dcd3c9b91: reads 4608 writes 14959
> After commit 8dcd3c9b91: reads 0 writes 14924
> With Kevins patch: reads 110 writes 14924
>
> I think this is a good result if it avoids other issues.
Sounds like a promising way to make the tradeoff. Thanks for testing!
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 15:22 [RFC PATCH 0/2] qemu-img convert: Fix sparseness detection Kevin Wolf
2021-04-15 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] iotests: Test qemu-img convert of zeroed data cluster Kevin Wolf
2021-04-15 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] qemu-img convert: Fix sparseness detection Kevin Wolf
2021-04-20 14:31 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-20 15:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-20 16:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-19 13:24 ` Peter Lieven
2021-05-19 16:48 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-03 11:17 ` Peter Lieven
2021-12-03 23:04 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-04 9:53 ` Peter Lieven
2021-12-17 14:43 ` Peter Lieven
2021-04-19 8:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Peter Lieven
2021-04-19 9:13 ` Peter Lieven
2021-04-19 12:31 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-04-19 17:12 ` Peter Lieven
2021-04-20 6:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-19 11:22 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YH14BcdHL3swf9Q2@merkur.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).