Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

[Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>]

Replying here to a missed followup on rfc v3 [1]

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:08 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> The kernel is documented using kerneldoc. It would seem odd to me to
> have a second parallel set of Documentation for Rust. Just like Rust
> is integrated into the kernel tree, is configured using Kconfig, built
> using make at the top level, i would also expect it to integrate into
> kerneldoc somehow. I see the Rust API for PHY drivers next to the C
> API for PHY drivers. Its just another API in the kernel, nothing
> special. I just use 'make htmldocs' at the top level and out come the
> HTML documentation in Documentation/output/
>
> But kerneldoc is not my subsystem. MAINTAINERS say:
>
> DOCUMENTATION
> M:      Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> L:      linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> S:      Maintained
>
> So this discussion should really have Jonathon Corbet involved, if it
> has not already been done.
>
>     Andrew

Having the documentation in the same place and able to easily
crosslink is a goal, but it's still a work in progress. It won't look
the same of course but I think that the rustdoc output will be under
kerneldoc, with some sort of automated crosslinking between related
modules.

The docs team is in the loop, see [2] which was merged. (I suppose it
must not be getting published still)

- Trevor

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/78da96fc-cf66-4645-a98f-80e404800d3e@lunn.ch/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20230718151534.4067460-1-carlos.bilbao@amd.com/