From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
jhogan@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mattst88@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
palmer@sifive.com, paul.burton@mips.com, paulus@samba.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, stable@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, tony.luck@intel.com, vgupta@synopsys.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] locking/atomic: arm: use s64 for atomic64
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:22:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522132250.26499-7-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522132250.26499-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
As a step towards making the atomic64 API use consistent types treewide,
let's have the arm atomic64 implementation use s64 as the underlying
type for atomic64_t, rather than long long, matching the generated
headers.
Otherwise, there should be no functional change as a result of this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
index f74756641410..d45c41f6f69c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -249,15 +249,15 @@ ATOMIC_OPS(xor, ^=, eor)
#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64
typedef struct {
- long long counter;
+ s64 counter;
} atomic64_t;
#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
-static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
+static inline s64 atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
{
- long long result;
+ s64 result;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_read\n"
" ldrd %0, %H0, [%1]"
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
return result;
}
-static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
+static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
{
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_set\n"
" strd %2, %H2, [%1]"
@@ -277,9 +277,9 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
);
}
#else
-static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
+static inline s64 atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
{
- long long result;
+ s64 result;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_read\n"
" ldrexd %0, %H0, [%1]"
@@ -290,9 +290,9 @@ static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
return result;
}
-static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
+static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
{
- long long tmp;
+ s64 tmp;
prefetchw(&v->counter);
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_set\n"
@@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
#endif
#define ATOMIC64_OP(op, op1, op2) \
-static inline void atomic64_##op(long long i, atomic64_t *v) \
+static inline void atomic64_##op(s64 i, atomic64_t *v) \
{ \
- long long result; \
+ s64 result; \
unsigned long tmp; \
\
prefetchw(&v->counter); \
@@ -326,10 +326,10 @@ static inline void atomic64_##op(long long i, atomic64_t *v) \
} \
#define ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN(op, op1, op2) \
-static inline long long \
-atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(long long i, atomic64_t *v) \
+static inline s64 \
+atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(s64 i, atomic64_t *v) \
{ \
- long long result; \
+ s64 result; \
unsigned long tmp; \
\
prefetchw(&v->counter); \
@@ -349,10 +349,10 @@ atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(long long i, atomic64_t *v) \
}
#define ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP(op, op1, op2) \
-static inline long long \
-atomic64_fetch_##op##_relaxed(long long i, atomic64_t *v) \
+static inline s64 \
+atomic64_fetch_##op##_relaxed(s64 i, atomic64_t *v) \
{ \
- long long result, val; \
+ s64 result, val; \
unsigned long tmp; \
\
prefetchw(&v->counter); \
@@ -406,10 +406,9 @@ ATOMIC64_OPS(xor, eor, eor)
#undef ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN
#undef ATOMIC64_OP
-static inline long long
-atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, long long old, long long new)
+static inline s64 atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, s64 old, s64 new)
{
- long long oldval;
+ s64 oldval;
unsigned long res;
prefetchw(&ptr->counter);
@@ -430,9 +429,9 @@ atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, long long old, long long new)
}
#define atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed
-static inline long long atomic64_xchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, long long new)
+static inline s64 atomic64_xchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, s64 new)
{
- long long result;
+ s64 result;
unsigned long tmp;
prefetchw(&ptr->counter);
@@ -450,9 +449,9 @@ static inline long long atomic64_xchg_relaxed(atomic64_t *ptr, long long new)
}
#define atomic64_xchg_relaxed atomic64_xchg_relaxed
-static inline long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
+static inline s64 atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
{
- long long result;
+ s64 result;
unsigned long tmp;
smp_mb();
@@ -478,10 +477,9 @@ static inline long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
}
#define atomic64_dec_if_positive atomic64_dec_if_positive
-static inline long long atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a,
- long long u)
+static inline s64 atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, s64 a, s64 u)
{
- long long oldval, newval;
+ s64 oldval, newval;
unsigned long tmp;
smp_mb();
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 13:22 [PATCH 00/18] locking/atomic: atomic64 type cleanup Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] locking/atomic: crypto: nx: prepare for atomic64_read() conversion Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] locking/atomic: s390/pci: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] locking/atomic: generic: use s64 for atomic64 Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 21:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] locking/atomic: alpha: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] locking/atomic: arc: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-23 23:10 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-22 13:22 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] locking/atomic: arm64: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] locking/atomic: ia64: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] locking/atomic: mips: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] locking/atomic: powerpc: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-23 13:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] locking/atomic: riscv: fix atomic64_sub_if_positive() offset argument Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 19:06 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] locking/atomic: riscv: use s64 for atomic64 Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 19:06 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-05-23 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] locking/atomic: s390: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] locking/atomic: sparc: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] locking/atomic: x86: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] locking/atomic: use s64 for atomic64_t on 64-bit Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] locking/atomic: crypto: nx: remove redundant casts Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 13:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] locking/atomic: s390/pci: " Mark Rutland
2019-05-22 21:18 ` [PATCH 00/18] locking/atomic: atomic64 type cleanup Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-23 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-23 8:30 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-23 10:19 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-23 11:20 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-24 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 11:38 ` Greg KH
2019-05-24 11:42 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 22:43 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-28 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-28 11:15 ` Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190522132250.26499-7-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).