From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
"Jian Cai" <jiancai@google.com>, "Stefan Agner" <stefan@agner.ch>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
candle.sun@unisoc.com,
"Miles Chen (陳民樺)" <miles.chen@mediatek.com>,
"Stephen Hines" <srhines@google.com>,
"Luis Lozano" <llozano@google.com>,
"Sandeep Patil" <sspatil@google.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARCH=arm LLVM_IAS=1 patches for 5.10, 5.4, and 4.19
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:02:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFC6ZYvBfI/mFvaV@sashalap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdm6FXWVu-9YkQNNyoYmw+hkj1a7MQrRbWyUxsO2vDcnQA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 03:58:07PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:53 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>> You haven't explained why all this effort is justified to begin with.
>>
>> Who cares about being able to build 4.19 or 5.4 mainline with Clang 12
>> and IAS?
>
>Ah, sorry, ChromeOS and Android very much do so. (Google's production
>kernels as well, though I don't think they have any 32b ARM machines).
>Android is already building 4.19+ with LLVM_IAS=1 for
>ARCH=arm64,x86_64,i686. ChromeOS is doing so for 5.4+ for
>ARCH=arm64,x86_64 as well. I'm not sure precisely what's going on in
>prodkernel land, but I know they have LLVM_IAS=1 enabled for x86_64.
>So when Greg says this is "for no real users" I disagree. Maybe no
>one is using LLVM_IAS=1 for ARCH=arm at this moment, but that was the
>point of the backports, to enable more distros to do so.
You can't both stay on a "stable" kernel because it's "stable", but
then expect a flow of new features. The users which you've mentioned
should be migrating to newer kernels instead of attempting to backport
features they care about to stable kernels.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 19:32 ARCH=arm LLVM_IAS=1 patches for 5.10, 5.4, and 4.19 Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-12 10:12 ` Greg KH
2021-03-12 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-13 4:07 ` Sasha Levin
2021-03-15 9:08 ` Greg KH
2021-03-15 9:12 ` Greg KH
2021-03-15 9:16 ` Greg KH
2021-03-15 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-15 17:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-15 17:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-15 22:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-15 23:19 ` [PATCH 5.4.y] ARM: 9030/1: entry: omit FP emulation for UND exceptions taken in kernel mode Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-16 6:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-03-16 16:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 2/2] ARM: 9044/1: vfp: use undef hook for VFP support detection Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-19 10:06 ` Greg KH
2021-03-19 20:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-20 11:04 ` Greg KH
2021-03-16 14:02 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2021-03-15 19:06 ` ARCH=arm LLVM_IAS=1 patches for 5.10, 5.4, and 4.19 Greg KH
2021-03-15 20:43 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFC6ZYvBfI/mFvaV@sashalap \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=candle.sun@unisoc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiancai@google.com \
--cc=llozano@google.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=srhines@google.com \
--cc=sspatil@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).