Re: Regression found (Stop-marking-clocks-as-CLK_IS_CRITICAL)

[Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>]

On 10/30/18 10:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30-10-18 16:04, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>> On 10/30/18 9:38 AM, Dean Wallace wrote:
>>> On 30-10-18, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi Dean,
>>>>
>>>> Attached are 2 different attempts at fixing this.
>>>>
>>>> When trying these patches do not forget to remove the revert of the
>>>> "Stop-marking-clocks-as-CLK_IS_CRITICAL" commit.
>>>>
>>>> Please first try the 
>>>> 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch
>>>> patch I expect that one to do the trick indicating that the Swanky 
>>>> model
>>>> uses a different pmc clk then which is normally used for the codec 
>>>> clock.
>>>>
>>>> If that patch does not fix things, please give the other patch a try.
>>
>> For Baytrail devices, the audio platform clocks are not managed by 
>> the firmware. They are for CHT-based devices - as can be seen by 
>> clock resources being described in the DSDT. We used to have a 
>> if(baytrail) in the code which was replaced by this CRITICAL label, 
>> but the point remains that there is a difference between the two SOC 
>> versions.
>
> As I mentioned before the CRITICAL flag was only added a year ago to 
> workaround
> an issue with on board ethernet needing plt_clk_4 on some laptops, 
> this never
> had anything to do with sound.

see commit 7735bce05a9c ('ASoC: Intel: boards: use devm_clk_get() 
unconditionally')

>
>> In addition I am not aware of any baytrail device using plt_clk_0, so 
>> moving a common machine driver such a cht_bsw_max98090_ti to use 
>> plt_clk0 only would break other devices (e.g. Rambi/Orco). Asking for 
>> both clocks to be on might work though, 
>
> Ok, so we need to have a DMI based quirk for the Swanky and maybe also
> the clapper to use plt_clk_0 there. Asking for 2 clks if we only need
> one does not seem like a good plan.
>
>> however you still have the problem of trying to manage from the 
>> kernel what the firmware already manages.
>
> The firmware only manages it when going to D3 state, with ASoC most of
> the codecs gets turned off (and we no longer need the clock) but we do
> not put the device in D3 / execute the _PS3 method. So from a pm pov
> it is better if we manage the clk ourselves.
>
> Once we do actually put the device in D3 (on suspend) the kernel will 
> have
> already turned off the clk and the _OFF method of the CLK3 power resource
> which directly pokes mmio, will just set the enable bit to 0 when it
> already is 0, so no problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29-10-18 23:03, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>>> On 10/29/18 2:08 PM, Dean Wallace wrote:
>>>>>> On 29-10-18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
>>>>>>> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Cc: Pierre as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:48 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Quoting Dean Wallace (2018-10-25 16:25:17)
>>>>>>>>>> I have found a regression in 4.18.15 that means I lose sound 
>>>>>>>>>> on my old
>>>>>>>>>> Toshiba Chromebook 2 (Swanky).  My system details are:-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Toshiba Chromebook (Swanky)
>>>>>>>>>> MrChromebox UEFI coreboot
>>>>>>>>>> Arch Linux running latest alsa/pulseaudio
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Upgraded kernel from 4.18.14 to 4.18.15 and lost all sound 
>>>>>>>>>> output.  By
>>>>>>>>>> output I mean, the card is still detected, the module loaded, 
>>>>>>>>>> all apps
>>>>>>>>>> showing sound is being playing, but no actual audible sound 
>>>>>>>>>> comes
>>>>>>>>>> through.  Upgraded to 4.18.16 same issue.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dug around and found Upstream commit 
>>>>>>>>>> 648e921888ad96ea3dc922739e96716ad3225d7f
>>>>>>>>>> clk: x86: Stop marking clocks as CLK_IS_CRITICAL
>>>>>>>>>> "This commit removes the CLK_IS_CRITICAL marking, fixing 
>>>>>>>>>> Cherry Trail
>>>>>>>>>> devices not being able to reach S0i3 greatly decreasing their 
>>>>>>>>>> battery
>>>>>>>>>> drain when suspended."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I reverted it and compiled 4.18.16 and have sound back 
>>>>>>>>>> again.  Could
>>>>>>>>>> this be looked into, with possibility of fix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the bug report. I'm adding some people involved in 
>>>>>>>>> the commit
>>>>>>>>> you mention is causing audio regressions. The best plan is to 
>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>> revert the commit from the 4.18 linux stable tree. Or there 
>>>>>>>>> may be
>>>>>>>>> another patch missing that would be useful to make this 
>>>>>>>>> backported patch
>>>>>>>>> work. Hopefully Hans or Andy knows.
>>>>>>>> Hans has been investigating S0ix issues on Baytrail and 
>>>>>>>> Cherrytrail machines.
>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that the problem can be fixed by properly 
>>>>>>>> handling
>>>>>>>> clock in ASoC driver(s). Perhaps Hans and Pierre can figure 
>>>>>>>> this out
>>>>>>>> better than me.
>>>>>>> Looking to sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5672.c I see no
>>>>>>> suspend-resume hooks. Perhaps, adding them like in the commit
>>>>>>> ac8bd9e13be2 ("r8169: Disable clk during suspend / resume") would
>>>>>>> help.
>>>>> I missed this change while i was away. It's indeed the expectation 
>>>>> that the audio mclk is handled by the firmware,
>>>> I believe that the statement "It's indeed the expectation that the
>>>> audio mclk is handled by the firmware" is not correct for BYT/CHT
>>>> platforms (and the commit causing the regression only affects BYT/CHT
>>>> platforms). Various machine drivers under sound/soc/intel/boards have
>>>> code to deal with the mclk themselves, like this:
>>>>
>>>>          drv->mclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmc_plt_clk_3");
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>          if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)) {
>>>>                  ret = clk_prepare_enable(ctx->mclk);
>>>>         ...
>>>>          } else {
>>>>                  clk_disable_unprepare(ctx->mclk);
>>>>          }
>>>>
>>>> The above code is from sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_max98090_ti.c
>>>> which is the machine driver used on the machines for which problems
>>>> are now being reported.
>>>>
>>>> And my commit introducing the problem is in essence a revert of:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=d31fd43c0f9a41e2678a1e78c0f22f0384c6edd3 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which is from 2017-07-14 and the ASoC code for BYT/CHT platforms is
>>>> much older then that.
>>>>
>>>> Also I asked Carlo why he wrote that patch and it was to fix a problem
>>>> with ethernet on some laptops.
>>>>
>>>>> not sure I understand why removing the CLK_IS_CRITICAL was 
>>>>> necessary or what it has to do with S0ix.
>>>> It is necessary, because if it is set the clock never gets disabled 
>>>> and
>>>> on x86 platforms using suspend2idle we are responsible for *all* 
>>>> the hardware
>>>> power-management as OS. If we do not disable the clocks then we can 
>>>> only
>>>> reach S0i1 instead of S0i3 when suspended leading to increased battery
>>>> drain during suspend.
>>>>
>>>> Also note that this patch is only causing problems on CHT + 
>>>> max98090 codec
>>>> using machines. I've tested it on many other BYT/CHT machines 
>>>> myself and
>>>> we've not had any other bug reports related to this.
>>>>
>>>> So this clearly points to a problem with the clock management in the
>>>> cht_bsw_max98090_ti.c machine driver.
>>>>
>>>> I've some ideas how to fix this and I will prepare some patches to 
>>>> test.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>> Excellent work Hans.  Compiled 4.19 with
>>> 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch, sound
>>> works as before.
>>>
>>> for i in /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_?; do echo -n "$i: "; cat 
>>> $i/clk_flags; echo; done
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_0:
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_1:
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_2:
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_3:
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_4:
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_5:
>>>
>>> Regards