From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] blkid: add magic and probing for zoned btrfs
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:08:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414150848.3ylrbzth7yjvgxgi@naota-xeon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414134708.t475gnqa7bor7bc6@ws.net.home>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:33:38AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> > +#define ASSERT(x) assert(x)
>
> Really? ;-)
>
> > +typedef uint64_t u64;
> > +typedef uint64_t sector_t;
> > +typedef uint8_t u8;
>
> I do not see a reason for u64 and u8 here.
Yep, these are here just to make it easy to copy the code from
kernel. But this code won't change so much, so I can drop these.
> > +
> > +#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_BLKZONED_H
> > +static int sb_write_pointer(int fd, struct blk_zone *zones, u64 *wp_ret)
> > +{
> > + bool empty[BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES];
> > + bool full[BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES];
> > + sector_t sector;
> > +
> > + ASSERT(zones[0].type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL &&
> > + zones[1].type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL);
>
> assert()
I will use it.
> ...
> > + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES; i++) {
> > + u64 bytenr;
> > +
> > + bytenr = ((zones[i].start + zones[i].len)
> > + << SECTOR_SHIFT) - BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE;
> > +
> > + ret = pread64(fd, buf[i], BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE,
> > + bytenr);
>
> please, use
>
> ptr = blkid_probe_get_buffer(pr, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE, bytenr);
>
> the library will care about the buffer and reuse it. It's also
> important to keep blkid_do_wipe() usable.
Sure. I'll use it.
> > + if (ret != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE)
> > + return -EIO;
> > + super[i] = (struct btrfs_super_block *)&buf[i];
>
> super[i] = (struct btrfs_super_block *) ptr;
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (super[0]->generation > super[1]->generation)
> > + sector = zones[1].start;
> > + else
> > + sector = zones[0].start;
> > + } else if (!full[0] && (empty[1] || full[1])) {
> > + sector = zones[0].wp;
> > + } else if (full[0]) {
> > + sector = zones[1].wp;
> > + } else {
> > + return -EUCLEAN;
> > + }
> > + *wp_ret = sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sb_log_offset(blkid_probe pr, uint64_t *bytenr_ret)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t zone_num = 0;
> > + uint32_t zone_size_sector;
> > + struct blk_zone_report *rep;
> > + struct blk_zone *zones;
> > + size_t rep_size;
> > + int ret;
> > + uint64_t wp;
> > +
> > + zone_size_sector = pr->zone_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + rep_size = sizeof(struct blk_zone_report) + sizeof(struct blk_zone) * 2;
> > + rep = malloc(rep_size);
> > + if (!rep)
> > + return -errno;
> > +
> > + memset(rep, 0, rep_size);
> > + rep->sector = zone_num * zone_size_sector;
> > + rep->nr_zones = 2;
>
> what about to add to lib/blkdev.c a new function:
>
> struct blk_zone_report *blkdev_get_zonereport(int fd, uint64 sector, int nzones);
>
> and call this function from your sb_log_offset() as well as from blkid_do_wipe()?
>
> Anyway, calloc() is better than malloc()+memset().
Indeed. I will do so.
> > + if (zones[0].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL) {
> > + *bytenr_ret = zones[0].start << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + ret = 0;
> > + goto out;
> > + } else if (zones[1].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL) {
> > + *bytenr_ret = zones[1].start << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + ret = 0;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
>
> what about:
>
> for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES; i++) {
> if (zones[i].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL) {
> *bytenr_ret = zones[i].start << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> ret = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> }
Yes, this looks cleaner. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Karel
>
> --
> Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
> http://karelzak.blogspot.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] implement zone-aware probing/wiping for zoned btrfs Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] blkid: implement zone-aware probing Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 9:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-04-14 9:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-04-14 13:31 ` Karel Zak
2021-04-14 15:03 ` Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] blkid: add magic and probing for zoned btrfs Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 9:49 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-04-14 13:47 ` Karel Zak
2021-04-14 15:08 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2021-04-16 15:52 ` David Sterba
2021-04-26 1:38 ` Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] blkid: support zone reset for wipefs Naohiro Aota
2021-04-14 9:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-04-14 9:50 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-04-14 13:57 ` Karel Zak
2021-04-16 16:04 ` David Sterba
2021-04-14 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] implement zone-aware probing/wiping for zoned btrfs Karel Zak
2021-04-14 22:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-04-22 14:41 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414150848.3ylrbzth7yjvgxgi@naota-xeon \
--to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).