xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] AMD/IOMMU: enable x2APIC mode when available
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:02:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D08EF0902000078002394DF@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f1290fa-6698-2f34-8c18-9b2d8854e64b@citrix.com>

>>> On 18.06.19 at 15:40, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 13/06/2019 14:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -1346,7 +1399,7 @@ int __init amd_iommu_init(void)
>>      /* per iommu initialization  */
>>      for_each_amd_iommu ( iommu )
>>      {
>> -        rc = amd_iommu_init_one(iommu);
>> +        rc = amd_iommu_init_one(iommu, !xt);
> 
> This logic is very subtle, and is a consequence of the bifurcated setup
> AFAICT.  I think it deserves a comment.

Will do.

>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_intr.c
>> @@ -796,6 +796,40 @@ void* __init amd_iommu_alloc_intremap_ta
>>      return tb;
>>  }
>>  
>> +bool __init iov_supports_xt(void)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int apic;
>> +    struct amd_iommu *iommu;
>> +
>> +    if ( !iommu_enable || !iommu_intremap || !cpu_has_cx16 )
>> +        return false;
>> +
>> +    if ( amd_iommu_prepare() )
>> +        return false;
>> +
>> +    for_each_amd_iommu ( iommu )
>> +        if ( !iommu->features.flds.ga_sup || !iommu->features.flds.xt_sup )
> 
> Why ga_sup?  I don't see anything in the manual which links xt_sup with
> ga_sup, other than the chronology of spec updated.

There is an (indirect connection), and I learned this the hard way -
I too was assuming that XTEn alone ought to be sufficient for the
IOMMU to use 128-bit IRTEs. But no, table 22 in the 3.04 doc
makes quite clear that it is GAEn alone which controls entry size.
GAMEn would also need to be set to actually do what I would have
thought should be controlled by GAEn alone.

> In particular, it is explicitly stated to be ok to use xt without ga,
> and the format of interrupts generated by the IOMMU is controlled by the
> XTEn bit.

Where did you find this? Depending how it's worded this may
deserve clarifying.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-18 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-13 13:14 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86: AMD x2APIC support Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for extended feature register Jan Beulich
2019-06-17 19:07   ` Woods, Brian
2019-06-18  9:37     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-17 20:23   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18  9:33     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/9] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for control register Jan Beulich
2019-06-18  9:54   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 10:45     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:23 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/9] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for IRTE Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 10:37   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 11:53     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 12:16       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 12:55         ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 11:31   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 11:47     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:23 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] AMD/IOMMU: introduce 128-bit IRTE non-guest-APIC IRTE format Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 11:57   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 15:31     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:24 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/9] AMD/IOMMU: split amd_iommu_init_one() Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 12:17   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-13 13:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] AMD/IOMMU: allow enabling with IRQ not yet set up Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 12:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-13 13:26 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] AMD/IOMMU: adjust setup of internal interrupt for x2APIC mode Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 12:35   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-13 13:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] AMD/IOMMU: enable x2APIC mode when available Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 13:40   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 14:02     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-06-13 13:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 9/9] AMD/IOMMU: correct IRTE updating Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 13:28   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-18 14:58     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:15 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] x86: AMD x2APIC support Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:19   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] AMD/IOMMU: restrict feature logging Jan Beulich
2019-07-01 15:37     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-01 15:59     ` Woods, Brian
2019-06-27 15:19   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for extended feature register Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 12:09     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-02 13:48       ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-16 16:02       ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:20   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for control register Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 12:20     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-27 15:20   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/10] AMD/IOMMU: use bit field for IRTE Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 12:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-02 13:56       ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:21   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] AMD/IOMMU: introduce 128-bit IRTE non-guest-APIC IRTE format Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 14:41     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-03  8:46       ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-16  6:39       ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:21   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/10] AMD/IOMMU: split amd_iommu_init_one() Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:22   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] AMD/IOMMU: allow enabling with IRQ not yet set up Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:22   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/10] AMD/IOMMU: adjust setup of internal interrupt for x2APIC mode Jan Beulich
2019-06-27 15:23   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/10] AMD/IOMMU: enable x2APIC mode when available Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 14:50     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-27 15:23   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 10/10] AMD/IOMMU: correct IRTE updating Jan Beulich
2019-07-02 15:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-03  8:55       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5D08EF0902000078002394DF@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).