xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/EFI: program headers are an ELF concept
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:36:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69abcc03-7ffc-10e2-0de3-26c6c84a6d26@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YH/sLn+g/7wsZUDy@Air-de-Roger>

On 21.04.2021 11:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
>> potentially misleading. Conditionalize their use to be for just the ELF
>> binary we produce.
>>
>> No change to the resulting binaries.
> 
> The GNU Linker manual notes that program headers would be ignored when
> not generating an ELF file, so I'm not sure it's worth us adding more
> churn to the linker script to hide something that's already ignored by
> ld already.
> 
> Maybe adding a comment noting program headers are ignored when not
> generating an ELF output would be enough?

Maybe, but I'd prefer this to be explicit, and I'd prefer for efi.lds
to not have any PE-unrelated baggage. The churn by this patch isn't
all this significant, is it? In fact in two cases it actually deletes
meaningless stuff.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01  9:43 [PATCH 0/8] x86/EFI: build adjustments Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/EFI: drop stale section special casing when generating base relocs Jan Beulich
2021-04-01 11:51   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-04-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/EFI: sections may not live at VA 0 in PE binaries Jan Beulich
2021-04-01 12:01   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-04-01 13:51     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  8:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:32     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 12:57       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:28         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/EFI: program headers are an ELF concept Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:11   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:36     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-21 14:21       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 14:30         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/EFI: redo .reloc section bounds determination Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:46   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:44     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:54       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86: drop use of prelink-efi.o Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:51   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/EFI: avoid use of GNU ld's --disable-reloc-section when possible Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 10:21   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 12:03     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:20       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 15:34         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22  7:22           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 10:42             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/EFI: keep debug info in xen.efi Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:06     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:30       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 15:38         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22  8:14           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 11:03             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:56               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 15:46                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 15:53                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 16:01                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23  7:30                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-23  8:51                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23 10:07                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-23 10:45                             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23 10:58                               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/EFI: don't have an overly large image size Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:18   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:15     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-15  9:53 ` Ping: [PATCH 0/8] x86/EFI: build adjustments Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69abcc03-7ffc-10e2-0de3-26c6c84a6d26@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).