xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86/EFI: sections may not live at VA 0 in PE binaries
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:28:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c9e3e9d-b47d-93f8-e1cf-22ddb246c0fb@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIAhHTsNlG7lQarM@Air-de-Roger>

On 21.04.2021 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> So from a bit of searching I just did it seems like stab sections
> where used during the 90s with ELF, but that this has long been
> superseded by DWARF 2 becoming the default in the late 90s, hence I
> think it would be fine to just remove those sections even in the ELF
> case?

Well, maybe. Even up-to-date gcc still supports -gstabs. Plus I seem
to have a vague recollection that Andrew objected to their removal
at some (not overly distant) point. I can't find any reference there
though, so Andrew: Do you have any specific thoughts here?

Of course with the stabs sections gone, .comment would remain. I'm
very firm in not wanting to leave any statements there putting
sections at VA zero. Irrespective of .comment (to take this example)
being listed under /DISCARD/ for PE. This would only be acceptable
(to me) if ld would always have at least warned about such sections.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01  9:43 [PATCH 0/8] x86/EFI: build adjustments Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/EFI: drop stale section special casing when generating base relocs Jan Beulich
2021-04-01 11:51   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-04-01  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/EFI: sections may not live at VA 0 in PE binaries Jan Beulich
2021-04-01 12:01   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-04-01 13:51     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  8:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:32     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 12:57       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:28         ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/EFI: program headers are an ELF concept Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:11   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:36     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:21       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 14:30         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:45 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/EFI: redo .reloc section bounds determination Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:46   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 10:44     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:54       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86: drop use of prelink-efi.o Jan Beulich
2021-04-21  9:51   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/EFI: avoid use of GNU ld's --disable-reloc-section when possible Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 10:21   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 12:03     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:20       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 15:34         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22  7:22           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 10:42             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-01  9:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/EFI: keep debug info in xen.efi Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:06     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 15:30       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 15:38         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22  8:14           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 11:03             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 14:56               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 15:46                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-22 15:53                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-22 16:01                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23  7:30                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-23  8:51                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23 10:07                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-23 10:45                             ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23 10:58                               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-01  9:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/EFI: don't have an overly large image size Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:18   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 13:15     ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-15  9:53 ` Ping: [PATCH 0/8] x86/EFI: build adjustments Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c9e3e9d-b47d-93f8-e1cf-22ddb246c0fb@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).