Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] xen/arm: optee: remove experimental status

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>]

Hi Volodymyr,

On 9/11/19 7:41 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> 
> Julien Grall writes:
> 
>> On 8/23/19 8:20 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies for the delay.
> It is okay. I myself was busy a bit.
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Julien Grall writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/19 7:48 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>>>>> As all TODOs and potential security issues are resolved now,
>>>>> remove experimental status from OP-TEE mediator.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at SUPPORT.MD, I think OP-TEE without this series would be
>>>> considered as "Experimental".
>>> Right.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With this series applied, I still think we should keep the Kconfig
>>>> behind EXPERT but mark it as "Technical Preview" for at least a
>>>> release. This would encourage people to test and report any potential
>>>> issues with OP-TEE.
>>>>
>>>> We can re-discuss about the state in a few months for future release.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, SUPPORT.MD should be updated to reflect the state of OP-TEE in Xen.
>>> Fair enough. In the next version I'll replace this patch with patch to
>>> SUPPORT.md. Or it is better to push separate patch for the documentation?
>>
>> I think the patch in SUPPORT.MD should go regardless of the state of
>> the rest. It is fine to keep it in this series.
> Okay. By the way, I skimmed thru SUPPORT.MD and I'm not sure what is the
> best place to describe mediator. So I could use some advice there.

Good question. I would put it under "## Virtual Hardware, Hypervisor". 
Maybe after the subsection "### ARM: Guest ACPI support"?

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel