From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08f63617-03df-71cf-70c4-00f08a9f51d8@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159175686974.7062.8526082970785072740.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Le 10/06/2020 à 04:41, Martin K. Petersen a écrit :
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:29:33 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
>> So use 'host' in both cases.
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> [1/1] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/af7b415a1ebf
>
Please revert, the patch is bogus, as spotted by Russell King - ARM
Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>.
See [1].
I'll try to send the correct fix by this week-end.
CJ
[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=159083184215730&w=4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:35:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08f63617-03df-71cf-70c4-00f08a9f51d8@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159175686974.7062.8526082970785072740.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Le 10/06/2020 à 04:41, Martin K. Petersen a écrit :
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:29:33 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
>> So use 'host' in both cases.
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> [1/1] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/af7b415a1ebf
>
Please revert, the patch is bogus, as spotted by Russell King - ARM
Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>.
See [1].
I'll try to send the correct fix by this week-end.
CJ
[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m\x159083184215730&w=4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08f63617-03df-71cf-70c4-00f08a9f51d8@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200610053549.hTIX6VsuDU9j9SBdLnDuqgzknpioXKvKrBk3nnA073Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159175686974.7062.8526082970785072740.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Le 10/06/2020 à 04:41, Martin K. Petersen a écrit :
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:29:33 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
>> So use 'host' in both cases.
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> [1/1] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/af7b415a1ebf
>
Please revert, the patch is bogus, as spotted by Russell King - ARM
Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>.
See [1].
I'll try to send the correct fix by this week-end.
CJ
[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=159083184215730&w=4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08f63617-03df-71cf-70c4-00f08a9f51d8@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159175686974.7062.8526082970785072740.b4-ty@oracle.com>
Le 10/06/2020 à 04:41, Martin K. Petersen a écrit :
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:29:33 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
>> So use 'host' in both cases.
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> [1/1] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/af7b415a1ebf
>
Please revert, the patch is bogus, as spotted by Russell King - ARM
Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>.
See [1].
I'll try to send the correct fix by this week-end.
CJ
[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=159083184215730&w=4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 7:29 [PATCH] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-30 7:29 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-30 7:29 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-10 2:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-10 2:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-10 2:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-10 5:35 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2020-06-10 5:35 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-10 5:35 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-10 5:35 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-10 11:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-10 11:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-10 11:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-06-26 3:59 ` [PATCH V2] " Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-26 3:59 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-06-26 3:59 ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-07-03 4:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-03 4:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-03 4:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08f63617-03df-71cf-70c4-00f08a9f51d8@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.