Re: [RFC v4 17/17] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases

From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	keescook@google.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com
Cc: brakmo@fb.com, pmladek@suse.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	richard@nod.at, knut.omang@oracle.com, wfg@linux.intel.com,
	joel@jms.id.au, jdike@addtoit.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	julia.lawall@lip6.fr, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com,
	khilman@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 17/17] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09b06e6d-fd36-707e-cb7a-e935bd930510@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214213729.21702-18-brendanhiggins@google.com>

On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> Split up the super large test cases of_unittest_find_node_by_name and
> of_unittest_dynamic into properly sized and defined test cases.

I also still object to this patch.

-Frank

> 
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/base-test.c | 297 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 249 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base-test.c b/drivers/of/base-test.c
> index 3d3f4f1b74800..7b44c967ed2fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base-test.c
> @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
>  
>  #include "test-common.h"
>  
> -static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *np;
> -	const char *options, *name;
> +	const char *name;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
>  	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> @@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  			       "find /testcase-data failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  	kfree(name);
> +}
>  
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
> +{
>  	/* Test if trailing '/' works */
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
>  			    "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
>  
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *name;
> +
>  	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
>  	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> @@ -33,6 +43,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  		"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  	kfree(name);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *name;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> @@ -41,10 +57,23 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  			       "find testcase-alias failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  	kfree(name);
> +}
>  
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> +{
>  	/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
> -			    "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
> +			   "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
> + * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
> + */
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *name;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> @@ -54,17 +83,33 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  		"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  	kfree(name);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
>  		test,
>  		np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"), NULL,
>  		"non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
>  		test, np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
>  		"non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
> +		struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
>  		test,
> @@ -72,12 +117,24 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  		"non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
>  		np);
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
>  			       "option path test failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> @@ -90,11 +147,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
>  			       "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
>  					 "NULL option path test failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
>  				       &options);
> @@ -102,6 +170,13 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
>  			       "option alias path test failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
> +		struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
>  				       &options);
> @@ -109,11 +184,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
>  			       "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
>  			test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	options = "testoption";
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
> @@ -121,6 +207,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
>  			    "option clearing test failed\n");
>  	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	const char *options;
>  
>  	options = "testoption";
>  	np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
> @@ -130,65 +222,147 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  }
>  
> -static void of_unittest_dynamic(struct kunit *test)
> +static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
>  {
> +	/* adding data for unittest */
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
> +
> +	if (!of_aliases)
> +		of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
> +			"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
> +	.name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
> +	.init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
> +	.test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
> +};
> +module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
> +
> +struct of_test_dynamic_context {
>  	struct device_node *np;
> -	struct property *prop;
> +	struct property *prop0;
> +	struct property *prop1;
> +};
>  
> -	np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> -	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +static void of_test_dynamic_basic(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +	struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
>  
> -	/* Array of 4 properties for the purpose of testing */
> -	prop = kcalloc(4, sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop);
> +	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
> +	prop0->name = "new-property";
> +	prop0->value = "new-property-data";
> +	prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
> +			    "Adding a new property failed\n");
> +
> +	/* Test that we can remove a property */
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, of_remove_property(np, prop0), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +	struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
>  
>  	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
> -	prop->name = "new-property";
> -	prop->value = "new-property-data";
> -	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
> +	prop0->name = "new-property";
> +	prop0->value = "new-property-data";
> +	prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
>  			    "Adding a new property failed\n");
>  
>  	/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
> -	prop++;
> -	prop->name = "new-property";
> -	prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
> -	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
> +	prop1->name = "new-property";
> +	prop1->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
> +	prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop1), 0,
>  			    "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +	struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
> +
> +	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
> +	prop0->name = "new-property";
> +	prop0->value = "new-property-data";
> +	prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
> +			    "Adding a new property failed\n");
>  
>  	/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
> -	prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
> -	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(
> -		test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
> -		"Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
> +	prop1->name = "new-property";
> +	prop1->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
> +	prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop1), 0,
> +			    "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +	struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
>  
>  	/* Try to modify non-existent property - should pass*/
> -	prop++;
> -	prop->name = "modify-property";
> -	prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
> -	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
> +	prop0->name = "modify-property";
> +	prop0->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
> +	prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop0), 0,
>  			    "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
> +}
>  
> -	/* Remove property - should pass */
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_remove_property(np, prop), 0,
> -			    "Removing a property should have passed\n");
> +static void of_test_dynamic_large_property(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +	struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
>  
>  	/* Adding very large property - should pass */
> -	prop++;
> -	prop->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
> -	prop->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
> -	prop->value = kzalloc(prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop->value);
> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
> +	prop0->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
> +	prop0->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
> +	prop0->value = kunit_kzalloc(test, prop0->length, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop0->value);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
>  			    "Adding a large property should have passed\n");
>  }
>  
> -static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +static int of_test_dynamic_init(struct kunit *test)
>  {
> -	/* adding data for unittest */
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx;
> +
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
>  
>  	if (!of_aliases)
> @@ -197,18 +371,45 @@ static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
>  			"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
>  
> +	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
> +	test->priv = ctx;
> +
> +	ctx->np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->np);
> +
> +	ctx->prop0 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop0), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop0);
> +
> +	ctx->prop1 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop1), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop1);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
> -	KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
> -	KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_dynamic),
> +static void of_test_dynamic_exit(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
> +
> +	of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop0);
> +	of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop1);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case of_test_dynamic_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_basic),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_large_property),
>  	{},
>  };
>  
> -static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
> -	.name = "of-base-test",
> -	.init = of_test_init,
> -	.test_cases = of_test_cases,
> +static struct kunit_module of_test_dynamic_module = {
> +	.name = "of-dynamic-test",
> +	.init = of_test_dynamic_init,
> +	.exit = of_test_dynamic_exit,
> +	.test_cases = of_test_dynamic_cases,
>  };
> -module_test(of_test_module);
> +module_test(of_test_dynamic_module);
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm