From: "Almahallawy, Khaled" <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com> To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] drm/dp: Use DP2.0 DPCD 248h updated register/field names for DP PHY CTS Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:13:21 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <104136c2cecfc24c95552d15825b1b37ba053bf6.camel@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8735ouofy0.fsf@intel.com> On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 13:00 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com > > wrote: > > This series updates DPCD 248h register name and PHY test patterns > > names to follow DP 2.0 Specs. > > Also updates the DP PHY CTS codes of the affected drivers (i915, > > amd, msm) > > No functional changes expected. > > > > Reference: “DPCD 248h/10Bh/10Ch/10Dh/10Eh Name/Description > > Consistency” > > https://groups.vesa.org/wg/AllMem/documentComment/2738 > > You can't do renames like this piece by piece. Every commit must > build. Noted, I apologize for messing that up. I will send v2 to make sure all renames of DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN done in one patch with the other changes you requested. Thank you for your review Khaled > > Incidentally, this is one of the reasons we often don't bother with > renames to follow spec changes, but rather stick to the original > names. > > However, in this case you could switch all drivers to the different > test > pattern macros piece by piece, as they're already there. > > > BR, > Jani. > > > > Khaled Almahallawy (4): > > drm/dp: Rename DPCD 248h according to DP 2.0 specs > > drm/i915/dp: Use DP 2.0 LINK_QUAL_PATTERN_* Phy test pattern > > definitions > > drm/amd/dc: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new name > > drm/msm/dp: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new names/definitions > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 6 +++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c | 16 ++++++++-- > > ------ > > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 13 +++--------- > > - > > 7 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Almahallawy, Khaled" <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com> To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/4] drm/dp: Use DP2.0 DPCD 248h updated register/field names for DP PHY CTS Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:13:21 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <104136c2cecfc24c95552d15825b1b37ba053bf6.camel@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8735ouofy0.fsf@intel.com> On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 13:00 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com > > wrote: > > This series updates DPCD 248h register name and PHY test patterns > > names to follow DP 2.0 Specs. > > Also updates the DP PHY CTS codes of the affected drivers (i915, > > amd, msm) > > No functional changes expected. > > > > Reference: “DPCD 248h/10Bh/10Ch/10Dh/10Eh Name/Description > > Consistency” > > https://groups.vesa.org/wg/AllMem/documentComment/2738 > > You can't do renames like this piece by piece. Every commit must > build. Noted, I apologize for messing that up. I will send v2 to make sure all renames of DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN done in one patch with the other changes you requested. Thank you for your review Khaled > > Incidentally, this is one of the reasons we often don't bother with > renames to follow spec changes, but rather stick to the original > names. > > However, in this case you could switch all drivers to the different > test > pattern macros piece by piece, as they're already there. > > > BR, > Jani. > > > > Khaled Almahallawy (4): > > drm/dp: Rename DPCD 248h according to DP 2.0 specs > > drm/i915/dp: Use DP 2.0 LINK_QUAL_PATTERN_* Phy test pattern > > definitions > > drm/amd/dc: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new name > > drm/msm/dp: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new names/definitions > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 6 +++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 12 ++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c | 16 ++++++++-- > > ------ > > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 13 +++--------- > > - > > 7 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 23:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-21 5:07 [RFC PATCH 0/4] drm/dp: Use DP2.0 DPCD 248h updated register/field names for DP PHY CTS Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] drm/dp: Rename DPCD 248h according to DP 2.0 specs Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 9:56 ` Jani Nikula 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/dp: Use DP 2.0 LINK_QUAL_PATTERN_* Phy test pattern definitions Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] drm/amd/dc: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new name Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] drm/msm/dp: Use DPCD 248h DP 2.0 new names/definitions Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-21 5:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Khaled Almahallawy 2021-10-26 2:43 ` kernel test robot 2021-10-21 5:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/dp: Use DP2.0 DPCD 248h updated register/field names for DP PHY CTS Patchwork 2021-10-21 5:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-10-21 6:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-10-21 9:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2021-10-21 10:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] " Jani Nikula 2021-10-21 10:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2021-10-21 23:13 ` Almahallawy, Khaled [this message] 2021-10-21 23:13 ` Almahallawy, Khaled
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=104136c2cecfc24c95552d15825b1b37ba053bf6.camel@intel.com \ --to=khaled.almahallawy@intel.com \ --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.