All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>,
	Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
	Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:42:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346686954.2391.13.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120903015343.GB2362@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>

Hi Shawn,

Am Montag, den 03.09.2012, 09:53 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> I do not understand the point of introducing those imx patches, 1 ~ 4
> and 7, 8.  They are all unnecessary churns to me.  IMO, 4 patches are
> enough.
> 
>  * genalloc: add a global pool list, allow to find pools by phys address
>  * misc: Generic on-chip SRAM allocation driver
>  * ARM i.MX: remove IRAM_ALLOC facility
>  * ARM: dts: add sram for imx53 and imx6q
> 
> Regards,
> Shawn

Thanks, I thought that first making the iram_alloc API work would
decouple this a bit from the coda vpu patches that depend on sram
support on imx53/6q. I'll work in your comments and reduce the patch
count as you propose.

regards
Philipp



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:42:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346686954.2391.13.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120903015343.GB2362@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>

Hi Shawn,

Am Montag, den 03.09.2012, 09:53 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> I do not understand the point of introducing those imx patches, 1 ~ 4
> and 7, 8.  They are all unnecessary churns to me.  IMO, 4 patches are
> enough.
> 
>  * genalloc: add a global pool list, allow to find pools by phys address
>  * misc: Generic on-chip SRAM allocation driver
>  * ARM i.MX: remove IRAM_ALLOC facility
>  * ARM: dts: add sram for imx53 and imx6q
> 
> Regards,
> Shawn

Thanks, I thought that first making the iram_alloc API work would
decouple this a bit from the coda vpu patches that depend on sram
support on imx53/6q. I'll work in your comments and reduce the patch
count as you propose.

regards
Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-03 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-31  9:26 [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26 ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ARM i.MX: Switch IRAM allocator to device tree initialization Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM i.MX53: Add OCRAM to device tree Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ARM i.MX6: " Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] iram_alloc: store the virt and phys mem address in gen_pool chunks Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:26   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] genalloc: add a global pool list, allow to find pools by phys address Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-09-03  2:09   ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03  2:09     ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03  2:09     ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-31  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] misc: Generic on-chip SRAM allocation driver Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:37   ` Jan Lübbe
2012-08-31  9:37     ` Jan Lübbe
2012-08-31  9:40     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-31  9:40       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-03  2:19   ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03  2:19     ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-31  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM: i.MX53: use generic on-chip SRAM allocator driver for OCRAM Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: i.MX6: " Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM i.MX: remove IRAM_ALLOC facility Philipp Zabel
2012-08-31  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2012-09-03  1:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM Shawn Guo
2012-09-03  1:53   ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03 15:42   ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2012-09-03 15:42     ` Philipp Zabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1346686954.2391.13.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dong.aisheng@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=richard.zhao@freescale.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.