All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Review the memory barriers around CPU access to buffers
Date: Tue,  9 Oct 2012 19:24:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349807080-9005-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349807080-9005-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We need to treat the GPU core as a distinct processor and so apply the
same SMP memory barriers. In this case, in addition to flushing the
chipset cache, which is a no-op on LLC platforms, apply a write barrier
beforehand. And then when we invalidate the CPU cache, make sure the
memory is coherent (again this was a no-op on LLC platforms).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c    |    1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
index 8b0f6d19..1223128 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c
@@ -1706,6 +1706,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(intel_gtt_get);
 
 void intel_gtt_chipset_flush(void)
 {
+	wmb();
 	if (intel_private.driver->chipset_flush)
 		intel_private.driver->chipset_flush();
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index ed8d21a..b1ebb88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3528,6 +3528,7 @@ i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool write)
 	/* Flush the CPU cache if it's still invalid. */
 	if ((obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) == 0) {
 		i915_gem_clflush_object(obj);
+		mb(); /* in case the clflush above is optimised away */
 
 		obj->base.read_domains |= I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-09 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6c3329lntgg@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
2012-10-09 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Only insert the mb() before updating the fence parameter Chris Wilson
2012-10-09 18:24   ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Only apply the mb() when flushing the GTT domain during a finish Chris Wilson
2012-10-11 19:43     ` Jesse Barnes
2013-01-19 13:40       ` Daniel Vetter
2012-10-09 18:24   ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Insert a full mb() before reading the seqno from the status page Chris Wilson
2012-10-11 19:46     ` Jesse Barnes
2012-10-19 20:40       ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-19 20:52         ` Jesse Barnes
2013-01-19 12:02           ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-09 18:24   ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2012-10-11 19:52     ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Review the memory barriers around CPU access to buffers Jesse Barnes
2012-10-19 20:48       ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-11 20:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-10-11 19:41   ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Only insert the mb() before updating the fence parameter Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1349807080-9005-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.