From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks.
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:30:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354883425-38531-3-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354883425-38531-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Add support for injecting machine checks (only repressible
conditions for now).
This is a bit more involved than I/O interrupts, for these reasons:
- Machine checks come in both floating and cpu varieties.
- We don't have a bit for machine checks enabling, but have to use
a roundabout approach with trapping PSW changing instructions and
watching for opened machine checks.
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 4 ++
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 2 +
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 3 +
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/trace-s390.h | 6 +-
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
8 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index e298a72..8617339 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2072,6 +2072,10 @@ KVM_S390_INT_IO(ai,cssid,ssid,schid) (vm) - compound value to indicate an
I/O interrupt (ai - adapter interrupt; cssid,ssid,schid - subchannel);
I/O interruption parameters in parm (subchannel) and parm64 (intparm,
interruption subclass)
+KVM_S390_MCHK (vm, vcpu) - machine check interrupt; cr 14 bits in parm,
+ machine check interrupt code in parm64 (note that
+ machine checks needing further payload are not
+ supported by this ioctl)
Note that the vcpu ioctl is asynchronous to vcpu execution.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index e47f697..773859e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -77,8 +77,10 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
__u8 reserved40[4]; /* 0x0040 */
#define LCTL_CR0 0x8000
#define LCTL_CR6 0x0200
+#define LCTL_CR14 0x0002
__u16 lctl; /* 0x0044 */
__s16 icpua; /* 0x0046 */
+#define ICTL_LPSW 0x00400000
__u32 ictl; /* 0x0048 */
__u32 eca; /* 0x004c */
__u8 icptcode; /* 0x0050 */
@@ -189,6 +191,11 @@ struct kvm_s390_emerg_info {
__u16 code;
};
+struct kvm_s390_mchk_info {
+ __u64 cr14;
+ __u64 mcic;
+};
+
struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info {
struct list_head list;
u64 type;
@@ -199,6 +206,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info {
struct kvm_s390_emerg_info emerg;
struct kvm_s390_extcall_info extcall;
struct kvm_s390_prefix_info prefix;
+ struct kvm_s390_mchk_info mchk;
};
};
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 22798ec..ec1177f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -106,10 +106,12 @@ static int handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static intercept_handler_t instruction_handlers[256] = {
[0x01] = kvm_s390_handle_01,
+ [0x82] = kvm_s390_handle_lpsw,
[0x83] = kvm_s390_handle_diag,
[0xae] = kvm_s390_handle_sigp,
[0xb2] = kvm_s390_handle_b2,
[0xb7] = handle_lctl,
+ [0xb9] = kvm_s390_handle_b9,
[0xe5] = kvm_s390_handle_e5,
[0xeb] = handle_lctlg,
};
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 070ba22..6b10267 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ static int psw_ioint_disabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_IO);
}
+static int psw_mchk_disabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_MCHECK);
+}
+
static int psw_interrupts_disabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PER) ||
@@ -82,6 +87,12 @@ static int __interrupt_is_deliverable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
case KVM_S390_SIGP_SET_PREFIX:
case KVM_S390_RESTART:
return 1;
+ case KVM_S390_MCHK:
+ if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
+ return 0;
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[14] & inti->mchk.cr14)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
default:
if (is_ioint(inti->type)) {
if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
@@ -119,6 +130,7 @@ static void __reset_intercept_indicators(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
CPUSTAT_IO_INT | CPUSTAT_EXT_INT | CPUSTAT_STOP_INT,
&vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
vcpu->arch.sie_block->lctl = 0x0000;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl &= ~ICTL_LPSW;
}
static void __set_cpuflag(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 flag)
@@ -142,6 +154,12 @@ static void __set_intercept_indicator(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
case KVM_S390_SIGP_STOP:
__set_cpuflag(vcpu, CPUSTAT_STOP_INT);
break;
+ case KVM_S390_MCHK:
+ if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_LPSW;
+ else
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->lctl |= LCTL_CR14;
+ break;
default:
if (is_ioint(inti->type)) {
if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
@@ -330,6 +348,32 @@ static void __do_deliver_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
exception = 1;
break;
+ case KVM_S390_MCHK:
+ VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "interrupt: machine check mcic=%llx",
+ inti->mchk.mcic);
+ trace_kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt(vcpu->vcpu_id, inti->type,
+ inti->mchk.cr14,
+ inti->mchk.mcic);
+ rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(vcpu,
+ KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_PREFIXED);
+ if (rc == -EFAULT)
+ exception = 1;
+
+ rc = put_guest_u64(vcpu, __LC_MCCK_CODE, inti->mchk.mcic);
+ if (rc == -EFAULT)
+ exception = 1;
+
+ rc = copy_to_guest(vcpu, __LC_MCK_OLD_PSW,
+ &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
+ if (rc == -EFAULT)
+ exception = 1;
+
+ rc = copy_from_guest(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw,
+ __LC_MCK_NEW_PSW, sizeof(psw_t));
+ if (rc == -EFAULT)
+ exception = 1;
+ break;
+
default:
if (is_ioint(inti->type)) {
__u32 param0 = ((__u32)inti->io.subchannel_id << 16) |
@@ -593,6 +637,61 @@ void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
}
+void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_machine_checks(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
+ struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int;
+ struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *n, *inti = NULL;
+ int deliver;
+
+ __reset_intercept_indicators(vcpu);
+ if (atomic_read(&li->active)) {
+ do {
+ deliver = 0;
+ spin_lock_bh(&li->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(inti, n, &li->list, list) {
+ if ((inti->type == KVM_S390_MCHK) &&
+ __interrupt_is_deliverable(vcpu, inti)) {
+ list_del(&inti->list);
+ deliver = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ __set_intercept_indicator(vcpu, inti);
+ }
+ if (list_empty(&li->list))
+ atomic_set(&li->active, 0);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
+ if (deliver) {
+ __do_deliver_interrupt(vcpu, inti);
+ kfree(inti);
+ }
+ } while (deliver);
+ }
+
+ if (atomic_read(&fi->active)) {
+ do {
+ deliver = 0;
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(inti, n, &fi->list, list) {
+ if ((inti->type == KVM_S390_MCHK) &&
+ __interrupt_is_deliverable(vcpu, inti)) {
+ list_del(&inti->list);
+ deliver = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ __set_intercept_indicator(vcpu, inti);
+ }
+ if (list_empty(&fi->list))
+ atomic_set(&fi->active, 0);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+ if (deliver) {
+ __do_deliver_interrupt(vcpu, inti);
+ kfree(inti);
+ }
+ } while (deliver);
+ }
+}
+
int kvm_s390_inject_program_int(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 code)
{
struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
@@ -646,6 +745,13 @@ int kvm_s390_inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm,
case KVM_S390_INT_EMERGENCY:
kfree(inti);
return -EINVAL;
+ case KVM_S390_MCHK:
+ VM_EVENT(kvm, 5, "inject: machine check parm64:%llx",
+ s390int->parm64);
+ inti->type = s390int->type;
+ inti->mchk.cr14 = s390int->parm; /* upper bits are not used */
+ inti->mchk.mcic = s390int->parm64;
+ break;
default:
if (!is_ioint(s390int->type)) {
kfree(inti);
@@ -755,6 +861,12 @@ int kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
inti->type = s390int->type;
inti->emerg.code = s390int->parm;
break;
+ case KVM_S390_MCHK:
+ VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 5, "inject: machine check parm64:%llx",
+ s390int->parm64);
+ inti->type = s390int->type;
+ inti->mchk.mcic = s390int->parm64;
+ break;
case KVM_S390_INT_VIRTIO:
case KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE:
default:
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index d75bc5e..b1e1cb6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_wait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
enum hrtimer_restart kvm_s390_idle_wakeup(struct hrtimer *timer);
void kvm_s390_tasklet(unsigned long parm);
void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_machine_checks(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_s390_inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_s390_interrupt *s390int);
int kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ int kvm_s390_inject_sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int action);
int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_s390_handle_e5(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_s390_handle_01(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_s390_handle_b9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
/* implemented in sigp.c */
int kvm_s390_handle_sigp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index d768906..66258b9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -176,6 +176,101 @@ static int handle_stfl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return 0;
}
+static void handle_new_psw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /* Check whether the new psw is enabled for machine checks. */
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_MCHECK)
+ kvm_s390_deliver_pending_machine_checks(vcpu);
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
+ int disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16);
+ u64 addr;
+ u64 uninitialized_var(new_psw);
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
+ return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu,
+ PGM_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
+
+ addr = disp2;
+ if (base2)
+ addr += vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2];
+
+ if (addr & 7) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (get_guest_u64(vcpu, addr, &new_psw)) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_ADDRESSING);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!(new_psw & 0x0008000000000000)) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = new_psw & 0xfff7ffff80000000;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = new_psw & 0x000000007fffffff;
+
+ if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0xb80800fe00000000) ||
+ (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x0000000180000000) &&
+ (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & 0x000000007ff00000)) ||
+ ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x0000000180000000) ==
+ 0x0000000100000000)) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ handle_new_psw(vcpu);
+out:
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_lpswe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
+ int disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16);
+ u64 addr;
+ psw_t new_psw;
+
+ addr = disp2;
+ if (base2)
+ addr += vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2];
+
+ if (addr & 7) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (copy_from_guest(vcpu, &new_psw, addr, sizeof(new_psw))) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_ADDRESSING);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = new_psw.mask;
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = new_psw.addr;
+
+ if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0xb80800fe7fffffff) ||
+ (((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x0000000180000000) ==
+ 0x0000000080000000) &&
+ (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & 0xffffffff80000000)) ||
+ (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x0000000180000000) &&
+ (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr & 0xfffffffffff00000)) ||
+ ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x0000000180000000) ==
+ 0x0000000100000000)) {
+ kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ handle_new_psw(vcpu);
+out:
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_stidp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
@@ -309,6 +404,7 @@ static intercept_handler_t priv_handlers[256] = {
[0x5f] = handle_chsc,
[0x7d] = handle_stsi,
[0xb1] = handle_stfl,
+ [0xb2] = handle_lpswe,
};
int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -333,6 +429,43 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+static int handle_epsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int reg1, reg2;
+
+ reg1 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x00f00000) >> 24;
+ reg2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x000f0000) >> 16;
+ vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] &= 0xffffffff00000000;
+ vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] |= vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask >> 32;
+ if (reg2) {
+ vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2] &= 0xffffffff00000000;
+ vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg2] |=
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & 0x00000000ffffffff;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static intercept_handler_t b9_handlers[256] = {
+ [0x8d] = handle_epsw,
+};
+
+int kvm_s390_handle_b9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ intercept_handler_t handler;
+
+ /* This is handled just as for the B2 instructions. */
+ handler = b9_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff];
+ if (handler) {
+ if ((handler != handle_epsw) &&
+ (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE))
+ return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu,
+ PGM_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
+ else
+ return handler(vcpu);
+ }
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int base1 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xf0000000) >> 28;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/trace-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/trace-s390.h
index 90fdf85..95fbc1a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/trace-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/trace-s390.h
@@ -141,13 +141,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_s390_inject_vcpu,
* Trace point for the actual delivery of interrupts.
*/
TRACE_EVENT(kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt,
- TP_PROTO(unsigned int id, __u64 type, __u32 data0, __u64 data1),
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned int id, __u64 type, __u64 data0, __u64 data1),
TP_ARGS(id, type, data0, data1),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(int, id)
__field(__u32, inttype)
- __field(__u32, data0)
+ __field(__u64, data0)
__field(__u64, data1)
),
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt,
),
TP_printk("deliver interrupt (vcpu %d): type:%x (%s) " \
- "data:%08x %016llx",
+ "data:%08llx %016llx",
__entry->id, __entry->inttype,
__print_symbolic(__entry->inttype, kvm_s390_int_type),
__entry->data0, __entry->data1)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index e676940..22859dc 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_psw {
#define KVM_S390_PROGRAM_INT 0xfffe0001u
#define KVM_S390_SIGP_SET_PREFIX 0xfffe0002u
#define KVM_S390_RESTART 0xfffe0003u
+#define KVM_S390_MCHK 0xfffe1000u
#define KVM_S390_INT_VIRTIO 0xffff2603u
#define KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE 0xffff2401u
#define KVM_S390_INT_EMERGENCY 0xffff1201u
--
1.7.12.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: s390: Support for I/O interrupts Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:33 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-11 12:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-12 0:36 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-07 12:30 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2012-12-10 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-19 9:44 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-19 9:44 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-19 10:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-12-19 13:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: s390: In-kernel handling of I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling capabilities Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:24 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: Add support for channel I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 8:01 ` Alexander Graf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-31 16:24 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-10-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354883425-38531-3-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.