From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling capabilities.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE13BE9-6E59-42CE-B2E9-CE69041AD0CA@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121210111613.4cab94c1@BR9GNB5Z>
On 10.12.2012, at 11:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:54:45 +0100
> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Missing patch description. Otherwise:
>
> "Add base infrastructure for enabling capabilities" would be redundant,
> no?
Well, whoever pulls this gets to say what style he likes. I simply heads-on reject every patch that doesn't contain a patch description, but only a subject line :). Others are a lot more relaxed about this.
And yes, it'd be redundant, but easier readable imho.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-11 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-07 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: s390: Support for I/O interrupts Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:33 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-11 12:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-12 0:36 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: s390: Add support for machine checks Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:51 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-19 9:44 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-19 9:44 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-19 10:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-12-19 13:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: s390: In-kernel handling of I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling capabilities Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 7:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-10 10:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-12-11 10:24 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2012-12-07 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: s390: Add support for channel I/O instructions Cornelia Huck
2012-12-10 8:01 ` Alexander Graf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-31 16:24 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] s390: Host support for channel I/O Cornelia Huck
2012-10-31 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: Base infrastructure for enabling capabilities Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE13BE9-6E59-42CE-B2E9-CE69041AD0CA@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.