From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
"tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <R65777@freescale.com>,
Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 <B02008@freescale.com>,
Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 07:49:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130510141213.GA31597@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com>
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 22:12 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> So I would assume you will not pick up these two patches, right?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235530/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235532/
>
> Anyway it is more easier to enable the external proxy by using this method.
> But if you insist, I can respin a patch to use the method you suggested
> since it will definitely reduce the window where the irq is hard disabled.
I would keep the EE_EDGE bit definition. I have no objection to a gradual
approach however for the other one where we apply it as is now to enable
coreint while you do a rework to make it better :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 <B02008@freescale.com>,
"agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
"tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <R65777@freescale.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 07:49:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130510141213.GA31597@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com>
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 22:12 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> So I would assume you will not pick up these two patches, right?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235530/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235532/
>
> Anyway it is more easier to enable the external proxy by using this method.
> But if you insist, I can respin a patch to use the method you suggested
> since it will definitely reduce the window where the irq is hard disabled.
I would keep the EE_EDGE bit definition. I have no objection to a gradual
approach however for the other one where we apply it as is now to enable
coreint while you do a rework to make it better :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
"tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <R65777@freescale.com>,
Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 <B02008@freescale.com>,
Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 21:49:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130510141213.GA31597@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com>
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 22:12 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> So I would assume you will not pick up these two patches, right?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235530/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/235532/
>
> Anyway it is more easier to enable the external proxy by using this method.
> But if you insist, I can respin a patch to use the method you suggested
> since it will definitely reduce the window where the irq is hard disabled.
I would keep the EE_EDGE bit definition. I have no objection to a gradual
approach however for the other one where we apply it as is now to enable
coreint while you do a rework to make it better :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-10 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 3:10 [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06 3:10 ` Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06 3:10 ` Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06 3:13 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06 3:13 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06 3:13 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06 23:50 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-06 23:50 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07 1:56 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 1:56 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 1:56 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 2:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07 2:06 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07 2:43 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 2:43 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 2:43 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07 3:04 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07 3:04 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-08 13:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2013-05-08 13:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2013-05-09 7:33 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 7:33 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 7:47 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 7:47 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 7:47 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 7:51 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 7:51 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:04 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:04 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:04 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:08 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 8:08 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 8:08 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 8:12 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:12 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:17 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:17 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:17 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 8:26 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:26 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:21 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 8:21 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 8:21 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 12:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 8:23 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 8:23 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 9:44 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 9:44 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 9:44 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:00 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 10:00 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 10:18 ` [RFC][PATCH " tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:18 ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:18 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:21 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 11:21 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 11:35 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:35 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:35 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 12:37 ` [RFC][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:37 ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 13:28 ` David Laight
2013-05-09 13:28 ` David Laight
2013-05-09 13:28 ` David Laight
2013-05-09 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 14:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 14:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 14:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 21:27 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 21:27 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 22:07 ` [RFC][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:07 ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-10 14:12 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 14:12 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 14:12 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 21:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-05-10 21:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=B02008@freescale.com \
--cc=B07421@freescale.com \
--cc=R65777@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.